IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v5y2013i4p1522-1544d24912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergent Evolution in Education for Sustainable Development Policy in the United Kingdom: Current Status, Best Practice, and Opportunities for the Future

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Martin

    (Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK)

  • James Dillon

    (UNESCO Centre, School of Education, University of Ulster, Cromore Road, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, BT52 1SA, UK)

  • Peter Higgins

    (Moray House School of Education, University of Edinburgh, Holyrood Road, Edinburgh, EH8 8AQ, UK)

  • Carl Peters

    (Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, University of Wales, Caerleon Campus, Newport, NP18 3YG, UK)

  • William Scott

    (Centre for Research in Education and the Environment, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK)

Abstract

This paper discusses the current status of all aspects of education for sustainable development (ESD) across the United Kingdom (UK), drawing on evidence from its political jurisdictions (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales), and setting out some characteristics of best practice. The paper analyzes current barriers to progress, and outlines future opportunities for enhancing the core role of education and learning in the pursuit of a more sustainable future. Although effective ESD exists at all levels, and in most learning contexts across the UK, with good teaching and enhanced learner outcomes, the authors argue that a wider adoption of ESD would result from the development of a strategic framework which puts it at the core of the education policy agenda in every jurisdiction. This would provide much needed coherence, direction and impetus to existing initiatives, scale up and build on existing good practice, and prevent unnecessary duplication of effort and resources. The absence of an overarching UK strategy for sustainable development that sets out a clear vision about the contribution learning can make to its goals is a major barrier to progress. This strategy needs to be coupled with the establishment of a pan-UK forum for overseeing the promotion, implementation and evaluation of ESD.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Martin & James Dillon & Peter Higgins & Carl Peters & William Scott, 2013. "Divergent Evolution in Education for Sustainable Development Policy in the United Kingdom: Current Status, Best Practice, and Opportunities for the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:1522-1544:d:24912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/4/1522/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/4/1522/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth A. C. Rushton & Sarah Sharp & Alison Kitson & Nicola Walshe, 2023. "Reflecting on Climate Change Education Priorities in Secondary Schools in England: Moving beyond Learning about Climate Change to the Emotions of Living with Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Anna Mogren & Niklas Gericke, 2019. "School Leaders’ Experiences of Implementing Education for Sustainable Development—Anchoring the Transformative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Bin Tang & Te-Tien Ting & Chyi-In Wu & Yue Ma & Di Mo & Wei-Ting Hung & Scott Rozelle, 2020. "The Impact of Online Computer Assisted Learning at Home for Disadvantaged Children in Taiwan: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Lynda Dunlop & Elizabeth A. C. Rushton, 2022. "Education for Environmental Sustainability and the Emotions: Implications for Educational Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Mandy Singer-Brodowski & Nadine Etzkorn & Janne Von Seggern, 2019. "One Transformation Path Does Not Fit All—Insights into the Diffusion Processes of Education for Sustainable Development in Different Educational Areas in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:4:p:1522-1544:d:24912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.