Author
Listed:
- Franziska Bertschy
(Institute for Pre-Primary and Primary Education IVP NMS, University of Teacher Education Berne, Waisenhausplatz 29, Berne-BE 3000, Switzerland
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Christine Künzli
(School for Teacher Education, Institute for Pre-Primary and Early Primary Education, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, FHNW, Obere Sternengasse 7, Solothurn-SO 4502, Switzerland
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Meret Lehmann
(School for Teacher Education, Institute for Pre-Primary and Early Primary Education, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, FHNW, Obere Sternengasse 7, Solothurn-SO 4502, Switzerland
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
Abstract
The term of education is an integral part of any programmatic political document on sustainable development. This fact underlines the significance that is assigned to education in the context of sustainable development. It leads to the question of what competencies teachers need in order to develop and implement educational offers in the field of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) so that they can aspire to and attain specific educational goals with their students. This touches on the question of the building of corresponding competencies in teacher education and further education. So far, few attempts have been made to describe teachers’ competencies regarding ESD and to develop corresponding competence models. The following article presents two models—Curriculum, Sustainable Development, Competences, Teacher Training (CSCT Model) and Learning for the future: The Competences in Education for Sustainable Development (ECE Model)—and discusses their benefit for teacher education and further education. These models differ in how broadly they define ESD and in what audiences they target at. This comparison shows and explains why competence models should focus on profession-specific core competencies if they are to be used as a basis for the conception of educational offers in the field of ESD in education and further education of teachers. The drawn conclusion consists in initial considerations for the conception of another competence model.
Suggested Citation
Franziska Bertschy & Christine Künzli & Meret Lehmann, 2013.
"Teachers’ Competencies for the Implementation of Educational Offers in the Field of Education for Sustainable Development,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-14, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:12:p:5067-5080:d:30866
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:12:p:5067-5080:d:30866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.