Author
Listed:
- Kan Wang
(School of Mechanical, Electrical & Information Engineering, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
Preparation and Application of Aerospace High-Performance Composite Materials, Future Industry Laboratory of Higher Education Institutions in Shandong Province, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China)
- Ruiqing Tong
(School of Mechanical, Electrical & Information Engineering, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
Preparation and Application of Aerospace High-Performance Composite Materials, Future Industry Laboratory of Higher Education Institutions in Shandong Province, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China)
- Qiang Zhai
(School of Mechanical, Electrical & Information Engineering, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China)
- Guomin Lyu
(China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, No.1 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100048, China)
- Yongsheng Li
(Shandong Tianrui Heavy Industry Co., Ltd., Weifang 261001, China)
Abstract
Bioenergy is one of the renewable energy sources with high expectations in terms of its potential for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation, and thus has been included in most global warming limiting strategies and pathways. However, within this context, a state-of-the-art and comprehensive understanding of the environmental performance of currently available bioenergy technologies is still missing. Hence, we conduct this critical review on life cycle assessment (LCA) studies regarding a wide portfolio of bioenergy technologies to deal with this lack of knowledge. Our critical review of exhaustively searched literature identified commonly existing limitations and difficulties in the selected LCAs in terms of essential aspects of LCA, i.e., system boundaries, functional unit (FU), multifunctionality, and impact categories. Key findings of our review are as follows: inconsistency of system boundary definitions, incomparability of LCA results due to various FU definitions, incomprehensiveness of impact categories, as well as a lack of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Finally, in view of the above findings, we present a generic guideline for future studies with the purpose of overcoming the identified shortcomings.
Suggested Citation
Kan Wang & Ruiqing Tong & Qiang Zhai & Guomin Lyu & Yongsheng Li, 2025.
"A Critical Review of Life Cycle Assessments on Bioenergy Technologies: Methodological Choices, Limitations, and Suggestions for Future Studies,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-25, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3415-:d:1632814
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3415-:d:1632814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.