IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3388-d1632248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Closed-Circuit Reverse Osmosis Performance Evaluation in a High-Recovery-Rate Water Reclamation Pilot Project

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Huang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, 3801 West Temple Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768, USA)

  • Simeng Li

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, 3801 West Temple Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768, USA)

  • Saied Dalagah

    (Department of Interior, Research and Development Office, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, CO 80215, USA)

  • Shaun Stone

    (Eastern Municipal Water District, 2270 Trumble Rd., Perris, CA 92570, USA)

  • David Ahles

    (Eastern Municipal Water District, 2270 Trumble Rd., Perris, CA 92570, USA)

  • Joe Mouawad

    (Eastern Municipal Water District, 2270 Trumble Rd., Perris, CA 92570, USA)

  • Mohamadali Sharbatmaleki

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, 3801 West Temple Avenue, Pomona, CA 91768, USA)

Abstract

Reusing treated effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plants is essential for addressing freshwater scarcity, a key objective of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). While closed-circuit reverse osmosis (CCRO) has shown promise in municipal reuse facilities, the comprehensive assessment of water quality parameters, especially at higher recovery rates, is lacking. In this study, at the San Jacinto Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility (SJVRWRF), we evaluated the performance of CCRO in treating municipal wastewater tertiary effluent, focusing on high recovery rates. Our analysis of selected chemical parameters across recovery rates ranging from 90% to 95% revealed the effective removal of suspended particles by CCRO. However, variations in removal rates were observed among ions, with chloride removal at 96.3% and nitrate removal at 79.6%, contrasting with fluoride’s complete removal and sulfate’s 99.7% removal rate. Divalent ions like calcium and magnesium exhibited better rejection than monovalent ions such as sodium and potassium. Additionally, the removal efficiency of total dissolved solids (TDSs), alkalinity, chloride, nitrate, sodium, and potassium decreased with an increasing recovery rate, while sulfate, calcium, and magnesium removal rates remained stable. These findings enhance our understanding of membrane treatment processes, providing valuable insights for future water reclamation projects to combat freshwater resource scarcity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Huang & Simeng Li & Saied Dalagah & Shaun Stone & David Ahles & Joe Mouawad & Mohamadali Sharbatmaleki, 2025. "Closed-Circuit Reverse Osmosis Performance Evaluation in a High-Recovery-Rate Water Reclamation Pilot Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3388-:d:1632248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3388/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3388/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3388-:d:1632248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.