Author
Listed:
- Yupeng Fan
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Chao Zhang
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)
- Chuanglin Fang
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
Abstract
The Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP), a critical ecological buffer for Asia, faces intensifying pressures from climate change and infrastructure expansion. The Qinghai–Tibet Railway (QTR), as the world’s highest-altitude railway, traverses this fragile yet economically vital region, where balancing ecosystem integrity and development remains a global sustainability challenge. While previous studies have documented localized environmental impacts of the QTR, systematic assessments of long-term ecological-economic interactions—particularly the synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service value (ESV) and economic growth—are lacking. This gap hinders targeted policy design to reconcile conservation and development in extreme environments. The present research integrates an enhanced ecosystem service valuation framework with spatial econometric modeling to quantify environmental changes and ecological-economic coordination in the Qinghai–Tibet Railway Region (QTRR) during 1990–2020. The analysis reveals a cumulative ESV increase of USD 54.4 billion over the past 30 years, driven primarily by grassland restoration and regulated land use transitions. Notably, county-level ecological-economic coordination improved significantly, with harmonization indices rising by 32–68% across all jurisdictions. However, latent risks emerged: five counties exhibited severe ecosystem-health-to-economy mismatches by 2020. These findings demonstrate that infrastructure corridors in fragile ecosystems can achieve partial ecological-economic coordination through policy interventions, yet persistent local disparities demand spatially differentiated management. By linking ESV dynamics to governance pathways—including livestock–forage balance mechanisms and green urban zoning—the present study provides a transferable framework for assessing sustainability trade-offs in extreme environments. Broader implications highlight the necessity of embedding adaptive ecological thresholds into infrastructure planning, offering experiences for the Belt and Road Initiative and other high-altitude development frontiers.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3345-:d:1631084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.