IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3332-d1630809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Occupational Chemical Risk Perception in Construction Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Mastrantonio

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Vincenza Cofini

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Loreta Tobia

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Giada Mastrangeli

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Paola Guerriero

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Claudia Cipollone

    (Occupational Medicine Unit, Abruzzo Local Health Authority No. 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Leila Fabiani

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

Abstract

Safety in workplaces is a requirement for work sustainability. Construction workers are frequently exposed to dangerous airborne substances. While previous studies examined chemical risks in other sectors, there is limited research on occupational chemical risk perception (OCRP) among construction workers. This study focuses on evaluating OCRP in construction workers and identifying its association with socio-demographic, occupational, and training variables. In L’Aquila, Italy, a sample of male construction workers involved in post-earthquake reconstruction were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Chemical hazard perception, occupational exposure, personal protective equipment (PPE) use, and training were all covered by our questionnaire. Although the involved 117 workers appear to be aware of dust-related risks and asbestos-related diseases, 53% think that there is no asbestos at their worksite. Respiratory protection equipment was used by 36% of the respondents. OCRP was associated with refresher training (OR = 2.56; p = 0.025); perception of noise (OR = 10.03; p = 0.027); and solar radiation (OR = 26.07; p = 0.001). Although we observed an appropriate awareness of some occupational hazards, gaps between awareness, hazard perception, and protective behavior were evident. Comprehensive site inspections and improved risk communication are necessary to assess chemical hazards and enhance work sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Mastrantonio & Vincenza Cofini & Loreta Tobia & Giada Mastrangeli & Paola Guerriero & Claudia Cipollone & Leila Fabiani, 2025. "Assessing Occupational Chemical Risk Perception in Construction Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3332-:d:1630809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3332/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3332/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3332-:d:1630809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.