Author
Listed:
- Kum-Sik Oh
(Division of Global & Interdisciplinary Studies, Pukyong National University, 45, Yongso-ro, Nam-Gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea)
- Moon Hwan Cho
(Ingenium College of Convergence Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin-si 17035, Republic of Korea)
- Byung Il Park
(HUFS Business School, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul 02450, Republic of Korea)
Abstract
While previous studies have focused on either conventional or digital innovations individually, few have empirically compared the relative impact of these two types of innovation on firm sustainability. Furthermore, few earlier studies have applied a dynamic capabilities perspective and a technology acceptance model (TAM) to understand how innovation strategies affect long-term competitiveness, particularly when targeting venture firms. In this vein, the aim of this study is to identify the factors that play an important role in the sustainability of venture firms and, in particular, to demonstrate which factor has a more positive effect between conventional innovation and digital innovation, which has recently been considered to be crucial. In this study, ‘corporate sustainability’ refers to the ability of venture firms to secure long-term growth potential and operational and resource efficiency, and the ability to maintain a continuous competitive advantage, even in a rapidly changing market environment. This is especially related to the ability of firms to adapt to change, maintain performance, and create new opportunities through innovation using digital technology. Based on the secondary data jointly surveyed by the ‘Korean Ministry of Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises and Startups’ and the ‘Korea Venture Business Association (KOVA)’, a regression analysis of 3000 data collected in 2022 was conducted. According to the result, both conventional and digital innovations are vital factors, but we found that digital-business-model innovation had a stronger impact for venture firm sustainability. This result provides valuable implications for improving the competitiveness and maintaining the sustainability of venture firms.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3226-:d:1628345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.