IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3222-d1628240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Geographic Barriers to Access Long-Term Services and Supports in Chengdu, China: A Spatial Accessibility Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sen Lin

    (Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • Shikun Qin

    (School of Public Finance and Taxation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Li Peng

    (College of Geography and Resources, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China)

  • Xueying Sun

    (School of Public Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Xiaolu Dou

    (School of Urban and Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100080, China)

Abstract

China’s rapidly aging population has intensified demand for long-term services and supports (LTSSs), yet geographic disparities in accessibility persist despite policy reforms like long-term care insurance (LTCI). This study evaluates spatial inequities in Chengdu, a megacity piloting LTCI, using an enhanced two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method with demand intensity coefficients and a spatial mismatch index (SMI). Results reveal critically low average accessibility: 0.126 LTSS beds and 0.019 formal caregivers per thousand recipients within a 60 min travel threshold. Accessibility declines sharply along urbanization gradients, with urban cores (“first loop”) exceeding suburban “second” and “third loop” by ratios of 1.5–2.1 and 2.0–8.0, respectively. Strong correlations with impervious surface ratios (R 2 = 0.513–0.643) highlight systemic urban bias in resource allocation. The SMI analysis uncovers divergent spatial mismatches: home care accessibility predominates in western suburbs due to decentralized small-scale providers, while institutional care clusters in eastern suburbs, reflecting government prioritization of facility-based services. Despite LTCI’s broad coverage (67% of Chengdu’s population), rural and peri-urban older adults face compounded barriers, including sparse LTSS facilities, inadequate transportation infrastructure, and reimbursement policies favoring urban institutional care. To address these inequities, this study proposes a multi-stakeholder framework: (1) strategic expansion of LTSS facilities in underserved suburban zones, prioritizing institutional care in the “third loop”; (2) road network optimization to reduce travel barriers in mountainous regions; (3) financial incentives (e.g., subsidies, tax breaks) to attract formal caregivers to suburban areas; (4) cross-regional LTCI coverage to enable access to adjacent district facilities; and (5) integration of informal caregivers into reimbursement systems through training and telehealth support. These interventions aim to reconcile spatial mismatches, align resource distribution with Chengdu’s urban–rural integration goals, and provide scalable insights for aging megacities in developing contexts. By bridging geospatial analytics with policy design, this study underscores the imperative of data-driven governance to ensure equitable aging-in-place for vulnerable populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sen Lin & Shikun Qin & Li Peng & Xueying Sun & Xiaolu Dou, 2025. "Assessing Geographic Barriers to Access Long-Term Services and Supports in Chengdu, China: A Spatial Accessibility Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3222-:d:1628240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3222/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3222/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3222-:d:1628240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.