Author
Listed:
- Junjing Zhao
(School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
Institute of Education and Innovation, Xi’an Eurasia University, Xi’an 710065, China)
- Qi Li
(School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)
- Xiaobing Hu
(School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
Institute of Education and Innovation, Xi’an Eurasia University, Xi’an 710065, China)
Abstract
Sustainable development is a complex dynamic process covering economic, social, and ecological dimensions. Theoretically, education investment can enhance educational capacity and offer high-quality education services, thus improving human resource quality, promoting social justice, and strengthening ecological awareness, which significantly and positively impacts sustainable development across these three dimensions. An empirical study using four-variable vector autoregressive models, with data from 2003 to 2020 on education investment and sustainable development in China and the United States as a contrast, reveals the following: (a) The impact of educational investment on sustainable development is dynamic, with the direction and strength of the effect varying over time and depending on different countries’ development conditions. In the U.S., previous-year educational investment can boost its own growth, social equality, and ecological development but may reduce per capita schooling years and human capital growth due to diminishing marginal effects. (b) In China, the previous year’s educational investment promotes current social equality but slightly hampers talent capital accumulation, ecological development, and its own growth. The investment from the year before last still promotes social equality, increases per capita schooling years for talent capital accumulation, has a less negative impact on ecological development, and inhibits its own growth more weakly than the previous year, showing declining effect strength. (c) Policy-wise, countries should diversify education investment sources, target areas with high positive marginal effects on sustainable development, and establish a dynamic adjustment mechanism for education investment to better promote sustainable development.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3068-:d:1624359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.