IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3042-d1623515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantification of GHG Emissions Using Different Methodologies in Tropical Conventional Cashew Cultivation

Author

Listed:
  • Jonnathan Richeds da Silva Sales

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60020-181, Brazil
    Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering, University of Valladolid, 34004 Palencia, Spain)

  • Viviane da Silva Barros

    (Embrapa Environment, Jaguariúna 13918-110, Brazil)

  • Claudivan Feitosa de Lacerda

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60020-181, Brazil)

  • Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo

    (Embrapa Tropical Agroindustry, Fortaleza 60511-110, Brazil)

  • Antonio Fabio da Silva Lima

    (Department of Plant Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60020-181, Brazil)

  • Adriana Correa-Guimaraes

    (Department of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering, University of Valladolid, 34004 Palencia, Spain)

Abstract

Quantifying GHG emissions from cashew cultivation, especially in Brazil, is essential to assess the environmental impact and promote the sustainable development of this activity. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare methods for quantifying GHG emissions based on empirical equations for life cycle inventories, using the conventional cashew production system in Brazil as a case study. The scope of the study encompasses, from gate to gate in a dwarf cashew production system, considering the production of one ton of cashew as a functional unit. GHG emissions were assessed and compared using the following methodologies: Nemecek-Calc, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, BR-Calc, and Agri-footprint. The environmental assessment followed ISO standards (14040, 14044, and 14067). The results showed that the carbon footprint varied among the evaluated methodologies, with a difference of 24.5% between the highest value (129.5 kg CO 2 eq-IPCC-Calc and BR-Calc) and the lowest (104 kg CO 2 eq-Nemecek-Calc) per ton of cashew. N 2 O was the main contributor to emissions, accounting for up to 75.9%, while CO 2 represented up to 25.8%. Based on the analysis criteria, WFLDB, IPCC-Calc, and BR-Calc are the most recommended methodologies, balancing clarity, scientific robustness, and regional adaptation. The choice of methodology is fundamental, as it directly influences the results and interpretation of the carbon footprint in cashew farming, impacting the sustainability of this agricultural activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonnathan Richeds da Silva Sales & Viviane da Silva Barros & Claudivan Feitosa de Lacerda & Maria Cléa Brito de Figueirêdo & Antonio Fabio da Silva Lima & Adriana Correa-Guimaraes, 2025. "Quantification of GHG Emissions Using Different Methodologies in Tropical Conventional Cashew Cultivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3042-:d:1623515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3042/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3042/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3042-:d:1623515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.