IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2604-d1613206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Risk Management Framework to Enhance Environmental Sustainability in Industrial Symbiosis Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Lucía Ventura

    (CIRCE—Technology Center for Energy Resources and Consumption, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Ave. Ranillas 3D, 1st Floor, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Ignacio Martín-Jimenez

    (CIRCE—Technology Center for Energy Resources and Consumption, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Ave. Ranillas 3D, 1st Floor, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

  • Marcelino Gallego-Garcia

    (CIRCE—Technology Center for Energy Resources and Consumption, Parque Empresarial Dinamiza, Ave. Ranillas 3D, 1st Floor, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

Industrial symbiosis (IS) fosters collaboration between industries to exchange materials, energy, water, and by-products. It contributes to environmental and economic sustainability by reducing resource consumption, decreasing greenhouse gas emissions, and generating economic benefits. However, managing risks in these exchanges presents challenges, particularly as materials like waste and by-products fall outside traditional supply chain practices. This paper introduces the Industrial Collaborative Risk Management (ICRM) Methodology, an extended Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) approach specifically designed for collaborative industrial ecosystems. The ICRM methodology provides a systematic approach to identifying, assessing, prioritizing risks, and implementing corrective actions, enabling the reliable implementation of IS. By effectively managing risks, this methodology minimizes disruptions in material and energy exchanges, strengthens the resilience of industrial ecosystems, and enhances their environmental ambitions. The methodology supports cross-sectoral communication, facilitates knowledge exchange, and promotes trust among stakeholders. A real IS case study demonstrates the ICRM methodology’s ability to document interrelations, standardize risk evaluation, and propose mitigation strategies. This work provides IS facilitators with a practical tool for effective risk management in complex industrial environments and lays the foundation for future applications in diverse ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucía Ventura & Ignacio Martín-Jimenez & Marcelino Gallego-Garcia, 2025. "A Risk Management Framework to Enhance Environmental Sustainability in Industrial Symbiosis Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2604-:d:1613206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katrin Katana & Besma Glaa & Murat Mirata, 2024. "Facilitator roles for knowledge sharing in industrial symbiosis networks during emergence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8540-8558, December.
    2. Martin Folch-Calvo & Francisco Brocal-Fernández & Cristina González-Gaya & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2020. "Analysis and Characterization of Risk Methodologies Applied to Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-35, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Polorecka & Jozef Kubas & Pavel Danihelka & Katarina Petrlova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Katarina Buganova, 2021. "Use of Software on Modeling Hazardous Substance Release as a Support Tool for Crisis Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Katarina Buganova & Maria Luskova & Jozef Kubas & Michal Brutovsky & Jaroslav Slepecky, 2021. "Sustainability of Business through Project Risk Identification with Use of Expert Estimates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2604-:d:1613206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.