IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2314-d1606873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Factors Are More Important in Land Consolidation Block Planning? An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritization

Author

Listed:
  • Müge Kirmikil

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Biosystems Engineering Department, Bursa Uludağ University, 16059 Bursa, Türkiye)

Abstract

Land consolidation is a comprehensive and challenging process in which block boundaries integrate parcels within natural and infrastructural boundaries such as roads, irrigation systems, and drainage networks, acting as a core framework. Effective block design is of critical importance, as it affects the long-term usability and productivity of agricultural parcels. In this study, the criteria effective in block planning were determined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and an attempt was made to determine the priority order of the criteria. The criteria affecting block planning in the study were determined as land slope and topography, soil properties and fertility, climatic conditions, water resources and irrigation facilities, current ownership structure (shareholding), road planning and transportation, environmental and ecological factors, social and economic factors, plant species and agricultural activities, infrastructure and technological facilities, fixed facilities, parcel structure, and existence of projects made or to be made by the investor institutions or organizations. It was determined that the most important of these was the “existence of fixed facilities” criterion. Determining the priority order of the criteria used in block planning also provides the opportunity to use the obtained results in GIS.

Suggested Citation

  • Müge Kirmikil, 2025. "Which Factors Are More Important in Land Consolidation Block Planning? An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Prioritization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2314-:d:1606873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2314/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2314/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saaty, T. L. & Vargas, L. G., 1979. "Estimating technological coefficients by the analytic hierarchy process," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 333-336.
    2. Qinghua Wu & Xiaoliang Guan & Jun Zhang & Yang Xu, 2019. "The Role of Rural Infrastructure in Reducing Production Costs and Promoting Resource-Conserving Agriculture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Rahmatollah Kazemi-nejad & Azam Rezaee & Ramtin Joolaie & Ali Keramatzadeh, 2024. "Investigating the effects of water resources consumption reduction policies on agricultural sustainability in different climates in Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1007-1032, January.
    4. Aleksandra Król-Badziak & Jerzy Kozyra & Stelios Rozakis, 2024. "Assessment of Suitability Area for Maize Production in Poland Related to the Climate Change and Water Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Jelena Kilić Pamuković & Katarina Rogulj & Nikša Jajac & Siniša Mastelić-Ivić, 2023. "Model of Priority Ranking of Cadastral Parcels for Planning the Implementation of Urban Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Bahar, Sevgi Kesici & Kirmikil, Müge, 2021. "The evaluation of agricultural landowner inputs before and after land consolidation: The Kesik Village example," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    7. Valtiala, Juho & Niskanen, Olli & Torvinen, Mikael & Riekkinen, Kirsikka & Suokannas, Antti, 2023. "The relationship between agricultural land parcel size and cultivation costs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    2. Banai, Reza & Wakolbinger, Tina, 2011. "A measure of regional influence with the analytic network process," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 165-173, December.
    3. Lea Piscitelli & Annalisa De Boni & Rocco Roma & Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano, 2023. "Carbon Farming: How to Support Farmers in Choosing the Best Management Strategies for Low-Impact Food Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Minjuan Lv & Zhiting Chen & Lingling Yao & Xiaohu Dang & Peng Li & Xiaoshu Cao, 2022. "Potential Zoning of Construction Land Consolidation in the Loess Plateau Based on the Evolution of Human–Land Relationship," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Bin Tan & Qiyuan Peng, 2024. "Reliability Analysis of Deep Foundation Pit Using the Gaussian Copula-Based Bayesian Network," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Sangmin Lee & Donghan Kim & Sunwoo Park & Wonseok Lee, 2021. "A Study on the Strategic Decision Making Used in the Revitalization of Fishing Village Tourism: Using A’WOT Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Shiyao Zhou & Chen Qing & Jia He & Dingde Xu, 2023. "Impact of Agricultural Division of Labor on Fertilizer Reduction Application: Evidence from Western China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Jian Zhang & Awais Jabbar & Xin Li, 2024. "How Does China’s Agricultural Subsidy Policy Drive More Commercially Productive Small Farmers? The Role of Farmland Scale, Labor Supply, and Cropping Structural Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Yin, Yanshu & Zhang, Yingnan & Wang, Shu & Xu, Ke & Zhang, Yang & Dogot, Thomas & Yin, Changbin, 2024. "Integrating production, ecology and livelihood confers an efficiency-driven farming system based on the sustainable farmland framework," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    10. Kai-Chao Yao & Dyi-Cheng Chen & Chih-Hsuan Pan & Cheng-Lung Lin, 2024. "The Development Trends of Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Machine Tool Technology," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-33, June.
    11. Michele da Rocha Moreira & Aldie Trabachini & Magno do Nascimento Amorim & Érik dos Santos Harada & Marcelo Andrade da Silva & Késia Oliveira da Silva-Miranda, 2024. "The Perception of Brazilian Livestock Regarding the Use of Precision Livestock Farming for Animal Welfare," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Kai-Chao Yao & Cheng-Lung Lin & Chih-Hsuan Pan, 2024. "Industrial Sustainable Development: The Development Trend of Programmable Logic Controller Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Gatterer, Markus & Leonhardt, Heidi & Salhofer, Klaus & Morawetz, Ulrich, 2024. "The legacy of partible inheritance on farmland fragmentation: Evidence from Austria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    14. Ela Ertunç, 2023. "The Effect of Land Consolidation Projects on Carbon Footprint," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Yue Shen & Cheng Wang, 2021. "Optimisation of Garbage Bin Layout in Rural Infrastructure for Promoting the Renovation of Rural Human Settlements: Case Study of Yuding Village in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Qiufang Shi & Xiaoyong Yan & Bin Jia & Ziyou Gao, 2020. "Freight Data-Driven Research on Evaluation Indexes for Urban Agglomeration Development Degree," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Muhammad Junaid & Ye Xue & Muzzammil Wasim Syed & Ji Zu Li & Muhammad Ziaullah, 2019. "A Neutrosophic AHP and TOPSIS Framework for Supply Chain Risk Assessment in Automotive Industry of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Ertunç, Ela & Uyan, Mevlut, 2022. "Land valuation with Best Worst Method in land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    19. Nanyan Hu & Yonghao Hu & Yi Luo & Laping Wu, 2024. "The Effect of High-Standard Farmland Construction Policy on Grain Harvest Losses in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Ming-Feng Hsieh & Yir-Hueih Luh, 2022. "Is Contract Farming with Modern Distributors Partnership for Higher Returns? Analysis of Rice Farm Households in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2314-:d:1606873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.