IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2176-d1604115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low-Carbon Bio-Concretes with Wood, Bamboo, and Rice Husk Aggregates: Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Wall Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Arthur Ferreira de Araujo

    (Teaching and Research Center for Low Environmental Impact Materials and Technologies in Sustainable Construction (NUMATS), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-611, Brazil)

  • Lucas Rosse Caldas

    (Teaching and Research Center for Low Environmental Impact Materials and Technologies in Sustainable Construction (NUMATS), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-611, Brazil)

  • Nicole Pagan Hasparyk

    (Eletrobras Furnas, Av. Graça Aranha, 26, Rio de Janeiro 20030-000, Brazil)

  • Romildo Dias Toledo Filho

    (Teaching and Research Center for Low Environmental Impact Materials and Technologies in Sustainable Construction (NUMATS), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-611, Brazil)

Abstract

This study evaluates the carbon footprint of three bio-concrete families—wood (WBC), bamboo (BBC), and rice husk (RHBC)—and their application in wall components (as blocks and as boards). A cradle-to-grave, carbon-focused Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was used to compare these bio-concretes to conventional masonry and industrialized light-framing solutions. Each bio-concrete family incorporated biomass volumetric fractions of 40%, 45%, and 50%, using a ternary cementitious matrix of cement, rice husk ash, and fly ash (0.45:0.25:0.30). Sensitivity analyses examined the impacts of transport distances and the parameters affecting biogenic carbon storage, such as carbon retention periods in the built environment. The carbon footprint results demonstrated a significantly low or negative balance of emissions: WBC ranged from −109 to 31 kgCO 2 -eq./m 3 , BBC from −113 to 28 kgCO 2 -eq./m 3 , and RHBC from 57 to 165 kgCO 2 -eq./m 3 . The findings emphasized the importance of ensuring bio-concrete durability to maximize biogenic carbon storage and highlighted the environmental advantages of bio-concrete wall systems compared to conventional solutions. For instance, BBC boards replacing fiber cement boards in light-framing systems achieved a 62 kgCO 2 -eq./m 2 reduction, primarily due to the production (A1–A3) and replacement (B4) stages. This research outlines the emission profiles of innovative materials with the potential to mitigate global warming through circular construction, offering a sustainable portfolio for designers, builders, and AECO professionals seeking non-conventional solutions aligned with circular economy principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Arthur Ferreira de Araujo & Lucas Rosse Caldas & Nicole Pagan Hasparyk & Romildo Dias Toledo Filho, 2025. "Low-Carbon Bio-Concretes with Wood, Bamboo, and Rice Husk Aggregates: Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Wall Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2176-:d:1604115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2176/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2176/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2176-:d:1604115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.