Author
Listed:
- Zhen Zhao
(Bureau of Qinghai Environmental Geological Prospecting, Xi’ning 810007, China
Key Lab of Geo-Environment of Qinghai Province, Xi’ning 810007, China
Qinghai 906 Engineering Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’ning 810007, China)
- Gongxi Liu
(Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
Geothermal and Geological Party, Geological Mineral Exploration and Development Bureau of Tibet Autonomous Region, Lhasa 850000, China)
- Guangxiong Qin
(Bureau of Qinghai Environmental Geological Prospecting, Xi’ning 810007, China
Key Lab of Geo-Environment of Qinghai Province, Xi’ning 810007, China
Qinghai 906 Engineering Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’ning 810007, China)
- Huijuan Chen
(Bureau of Qinghai Environmental Geological Prospecting, Xi’ning 810007, China
Key Lab of Geo-Environment of Qinghai Province, Xi’ning 810007, China
Qinghai 906 Engineering Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’ning 810007, China)
- Huizhu Chen
(School of International Studies, Chengdu College of Arts and Sciences, Chengdu 610401, China)
- Wenxu Hu
(Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
MOE Key Laboratory of Groundwater Circulation and Environmental Evolution, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)
- Shaokang Yang
(Bureau of Qinghai Environmental Geological Prospecting, Xi’ning 810007, China
Key Lab of Geo-Environment of Qinghai Province, Xi’ning 810007, China
Qinghai 906 Engineering Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’ning 810007, China)
- Jie Wang
(Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
Sichuan Province Engineering Technology Research Center of Ecological Mitigation of Geohazards in Tibet Plateau Transportation Corridors, Chengdu 611756, China)
- Yuqing Zhang
(Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
Sichuan Province Engineering Technology Research Center of Ecological Mitigation of Geohazards in Tibet Plateau Transportation Corridors, Chengdu 611756, China)
- Dongyang Zhao
(Bureau of Qinghai Environmental Geological Prospecting, Xi’ning 810007, China
Key Lab of Geo-Environment of Qinghai Province, Xi’ning 810007, China
Qinghai 906 Engineering Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’ning 810007, China)
- Yu Liu
(Xiamen Institute of Environmental Science, Xiamen 361006, China)
- Yong Xiao
(Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China
MOE Key Laboratory of Groundwater Circulation and Environmental Evolution, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
Sichuan Province Engineering Technology Research Center of Ecological Mitigation of Geohazards in Tibet Plateau Transportation Corridors, Chengdu 611756, China)
Abstract
Groundwater is crucial for domestic, agricultural, and ecological uses, particularly in the lower reaches of arid basins, where its quality often limits availability. A total of 26 phreatic groundwater samples were collected from a typical endorheic watershed on the Tibetan Plateau to assess the hydrochemical characteristics of phreatic groundwater in the lower reaches of arid inland watersheds. The hydrochemical characteristics, quality, and formation mechanisms of groundwater were analyzed using the Entropy-Weight Water Quality Index (EWQI), irrigation water quality indexes (such as sodium adsorption ratio, soluble sodium percentage, and permeability index), hydrochemical diagrams, and correlation analysis. The findings indicate that phreatic groundwater in the lower reaches is slightly alkaline, with a substantial TDS variation from 252.58 to 1810.41 mg/L. Groundwater is predominantly characterized by fresh hydrochemical facies of HCO 3 -Ca and HCO 3 -Na types, with a few saline Cl-Na types present. The concentrations of NO 3 − , NO 2 − and NH 4 + , in groundwater range from 0.32 to 100.00 mg/L, 0.00 to 0.48 mg/L, and 0.00 to 0.20 mg/L, respectively, and 3.59%, 26.92%, and 7.69% of the samples exceeding the permissible drinking limits recommended by Chinese guideline and World Health Organization. Groundwater is classified as fresh at 80.8% of sampling sites and brackish at 19.2%. Approximately 96.2% of the sampled groundwaters is rated as excellent to medium quality according to EWQI assessments, suitable for domestic use, while 3.8% is of extremely poor quality and should be avoided for direct consumption. Groundwater from all sampling sites is suitable for agricultural irrigation and does not pose permeability hazards to the soil. Most groundwaters are suitable for long-term irrigation in terms of sodium hazards, with only 3.8% and 7.7% of samples falling into the “Permissible to Doubtful” and “Doubtful to Unsuitable” categories, respectively. Salinity poses the primary threat in long-term irrigation, with 38.5%, 53.8%, and 7.7% of sampled groundwaters exhibiting moderate, high, and very high salinity risks, respectively. Groundwater chemistry is primarily governed by water-rock interaction and evaporation, with additional impacts from agricultural inputs of nitrogen contaminants and chemicals. Agricultural practices contribute to elevated groundwater salinity in the study area, while natural evaporation drives salinity accumulation in the lower parts. In managing and utilizing groundwater resources in the study area and similar arid regions globally, attention should be paid to salinity caused by agricultural activities and natural evaporation, as well as nitrogen pollution from farming.
Suggested Citation
Zhen Zhao & Gongxi Liu & Guangxiong Qin & Huijuan Chen & Huizhu Chen & Wenxu Hu & Shaokang Yang & Jie Wang & Yuqing Zhang & Dongyang Zhao & Yu Liu & Yong Xiao, 2025.
"Exploring the Hydrochemical Characteristics and Controlling Processes of Groundwater in Agricultural Lower Reaches of a Typical Arid Watershed on Tibetan Plateau,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2117-:d:1602494
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Radoslav Bujnovský & Štefan Koco & Roman Cibulka & Andrea Vranovská & Dana Vrablíková, 2022.
"Nitrate Concentration in Leachate—Essential Information for Reducing Nitrogen Surplus and Groundwater Pollution from Agricultural Land in Slovakia,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.
- Aleksandra Bawiec & Joanna Kajewska-Szkudlarek & Krzysztof Pulikowski & Katarzyna Pawęska, 2022.
"Assessment of the Validity of Introducing Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Large Areas,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2117-:d:1602494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.