IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2078-d1601716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Sustainability and Subjective Well-Being: A Study on Italian Inner Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Capecchi

    (Department of Political Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy)

  • Marcella Corduas

    (Department of Political Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy)

  • Domenico Piccolo

    (Department of Political Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy)

Abstract

Social sustainability relies on the promotion of social processes and structures that ensure the basic needs of individuals and communities are met while also encouraging constructive interactions among them. This paper offers an overview of the characteristics of Italy’s peripheral rural areas and presents findings from a targeted survey conducted across three southern Italian regions. Evaluations collected from a sample of residents were analyzed using the class of CUB models, which are suitable for preference and opinion data. Subjective perceptions of well-being and quality of life, community participation, and the quality of social relationships were examined. Residents’ opinions on the available services in the areas, including economic facilities, digitalization, and transportation, were also considered. Our research indicates that perceptions of well-being in the peripheral areas of Italy are remarkably influenced by individuals’ assessments of their income adequacy. Our findings establish a strong connection between a positive self-assessment of well-being and the belief that income can sufficiently meet needs. Exploring the perceptual dimensions of well-being can offer valuable insights for stakeholders and decision-makers in developing policy efforts and community-led social innovations, which are critical for fighting sentiments of marginalization in rural areas caused by economic perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Capecchi & Marcella Corduas & Domenico Piccolo, 2025. "Social Sustainability and Subjective Well-Being: A Study on Italian Inner Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2078-:d:1601716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2078/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2078/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianpaolo Basile & Aurora Cavallo, 2020. "Rural Identity, Authenticity, and Sustainability in Italian Inner Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Norleen Ackerman & Beatrice Paolucci, 1983. "Objective and subjective income adequacy: Their relationship to perceived life quality measures," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 25-48, January.
    3. Mikucka, Malgorzata & Sarracino, Francesco & Dubrow, Joshua K., 2017. "When Does Economic Growth Improve Life Satisfaction? Multilevel Analysis of the Roles of Social Trust and Income Inequality in 46 Countries, 1981–2012," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 447-459.
    4. Cruces, Guillermo & Perez-Truglia, Ricardo & Tetaz, Martin, 2013. "Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 100-112.
    5. M. Bruna Zolin & Paola Ferretti & Mirco Grandi, 2020. "Sustainability in Peripheral and Ultra-Peripheral Rural Areas through a Multi-Attribute Analysis: The Case of the Italian Insular Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Paolo Brunori, 2017. "The Perception of Inequality of Opportunity in Europe," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 63(3), pages 464-491, September.
    7. Leonardo Grilli & Carla Rampichini & Roberta Varriale, 2015. "Binomial Mixture Modeling of University Credits," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(22), pages 4866-4879, November.
    8. Rosaria Simone & Marcella Corduas & Domenico Piccolo, 2023. "Dynamic modelling of price expectations and judgments," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 81(3), pages 323-342, December.
    9. Mair, Patrick & de Leeuw, Jan, 2010. "A General Framework for Multivariate Analysis with Optimal Scaling: The R Package aspect," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 32(i09).
    10. Marco Rossitti & Marta Dell’Ovo & Alessandra Oppio & Francesca Torrieri, 2021. "The Italian National Strategy for Inner Areas (SNAI): A Critical Analysis of the Indicator Grid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonino Callea & Dalila De Rosa & Giovanni Ferri & Francesca Lipari & Marco Costanzi, 2022. "Can Emotional Intelligence promote Individual Wellbeing and protect from perceptions' traps?," CERBE Working Papers wpC39, CERBE Center for Relationship Banking and Economics.
    2. Michał Litwiński & Rafał Iwański & Łukasz Tomczak, 2023. "Acceptance for Income Inequality in Poland," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 381-412, April.
    3. Bavetta, Sebastiano & Li Donni, Paolo & Marino, Maria, 2020. "How consistent are perceptions of inequality?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Ibrahim, Solava, 2021. "The dynamics of the Egyptian social contract: How the political changes affected the poor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Knight, John & Gunatilaka, Ramani, 2022. "Income inequality and happiness: Which inequalities matter in China?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Andreas Kuhn, 2020. "The individual (mis-)perception of wage inequality: measurement, correlates and implications," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 2039-2069, November.
    7. Giovanni Ottomano Palmisano & Ruggiero Sardaro & Piermichele La Sala, 2022. "Recovery and Resilience of the Inner Areas: Identifying Collective Policy Actions through PROMETHEE II," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Gimpelson, V. & Chernina, E., 2020. "How we perceive our place in income distribution and how the perceptions deviate from reality," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 46(2), pages 30-56.
    9. Jon M. Jachimowicz & Shai Davidai & Daniela Goya‐Tocchetto & Barnabas Szaszi & Martin V. Day & Stephanie J. Tepper & L. Taylor Phillips & M. Usman Mirza & Nailya Ordabayeva & Oliver P. Hauser, 2023. "Inequality in researchers’ minds: Four guiding questions for studying subjective perceptions of economic inequality," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1534-1561, December.
    10. Patricia Justino & Bruno Martorano, 2016. "Inequality, Distributive Beliefs and Protests: A Recent Story from Latin America," Working Papers - Economics wp2016_06.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    11. Kuhn, Andreas, 2019. "The subversive nature of inequality: Subjective inequality perceptions and attitudes to social inequality," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 331-344.
    12. Dutta, Nabamita & Sobel, Russell S., 2023. "Trust and attitudes toward income inequality: Does individualism matter?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Francesco Capozza & Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2021. "Studying Information Acquisition in the Field: A Practical Guide and Review," CEBI working paper series 21-15, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    14. Collewet, Marion & Fairley, Kim & Kessels, Roselinde & Knoef, Marike & van Vliet, Olaf, 2024. "The design of welfare: unraveling taxpayers' preferences," OSF Preprints 4am7e, Center for Open Science.
    15. Alvaro Forteza & Cecilia Noboa, 2019. "Perceptions of institutional quality and justification of tax evasion," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 367-382, December.
    16. Lasse J. Jessen & Sebastian Koehne & Patrick Nüß & Jens Ruhose, 2024. "Socioeconomic Inequality in Life Expectancy: Perception and Policy Demand," CESifo Working Paper Series 10940, CESifo.
    17. Muhammad Faress Bhuiyan, 2018. "Life Satisfaction and Economic Position Relative to Neighbors: Perceptions Versus Reality," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(7), pages 1935-1964, October.
    18. Stefano Bartolini & Francesco Sarracino, 2021. "Happier and Sustainable. Possibilities for a post-growth society," Department of Economics University of Siena 855, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    19. Andrea F.M. Martinangeli & Lisa Windsteiger, 2019. "Immigration vs. Poverty: Causal Impact on Demand for Redistribution in a Survey Experiment," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2019-13, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    20. Xiaogeng Xu & Satu Metsälampi & Michael Kirchler & Kaisa Kotakorpi & Peter Hans Matthews & Topi Miettinen, 2023. "Which income comparisons matter to people, and how? Evidence from a large field experiment," Working Papers 10, Finnish Centre of Excellence in Tax Systems Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2078-:d:1601716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.