IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1909-d1598371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of the Sci-Tech Finance Policy on Urban Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from 283 Cities in China

Author

Listed:
  • Hongying Zhang

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Liyang Wan

    (College of Management Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266525, China)

  • Qiaozhe Guo

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China)

  • Song Nie

    (College of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

Abstract

To balance economic development with environmental sustainability and address the challenges posed by the new wave of technological innovation, China has focused on leveraging the synergistic effects of technology and finance. This approach aims to promote urban green technology innovation (UGTI), which is critical in achieving innovation-driven, high-quality development. This study draws on two phases of China’s “Promoting the Integration of Technology and Finance Pilot” policy, implemented in 2011 and 2016. It utilizes data from 283 cities from 2007 to 2021 and employs a multiple-period difference-in-differences (DID) model to examine the effect, mechanisms, and heterogeneity of science and technology (sci-tech) finance policies on UGTI. The results indicate that (1) sci-tech finance policies significantly foster UGTI. (2) The mechanism analysis reveals that sci-tech finance policies stimulate UGTI by enhancing the agglomeration of scientific and technological talent and factor allocation. (3) The heterogeneity analysis shows that sci-tech finance policies have a considerably greater effect on UGTI in eastern and non-resource-based cities than in western and resource-based cities. Furthermore, strengthening intellectual property protection, advancing digitalization, and implementing suitable financial regulations amplify the green innovation effects of the sci-tech finance policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongying Zhang & Liyang Wan & Qiaozhe Guo & Song Nie, 2025. "The Effects of the Sci-Tech Finance Policy on Urban Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from 283 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1909-:d:1598371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1909/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1909/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shengling Zhang & Zihao Wu & Wei Dou & Yao Wang, 2025. "Do government subsidies promote enterprise green innovation? Evidence from listed companies in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(10), pages 1124-1144, February.
    2. Yuanhong Hu & Sheng Sun & Yixin Dai, 2021. "Environmental regulation, green innovation, and international competitiveness of manufacturing enterprises in China: From the perspective of heterogeneous regulatory tools," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Du, Kerui & Cheng, Yuanyuan & Yao, Xin, 2021. "Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Khan, Zeeshan & Ali, Shahid & Dong, Kangyin & Li, Rita Yi Man, 2021. "How does fiscal decentralization affect CO2 emissions? The roles of institutions and human capital," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Ang, James & Yan, Zhenli & Xiao, Tusheng & Yuan, Chun & Wang, Jingfang, 2024. "Impact of Fintech on labor allocation efficiency in firms: Empirical evidence from China," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Jing-Wen Huang & Yong-Hui Li, 2017. "Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 309-324, October.
    7. Wu, Tao & Kung, Chih-Chun, 2020. "Carbon emissions, technology upgradation and financing risk of the green supply chain competition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Irfan, Muhammad & Razzaq, Asif & Sharif, Arshian & Yang, Xiaodong, 2022. "Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    9. Dian, Jie & Song, Tian & Li, Shenglan, 2024. "Facilitating or inhibiting? Spatial effects of the digital economy affecting urban green technology innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Miao, Chenglin & Fang, Debin & Sun, Liyan & Luo, Qiaoling, 2017. "Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 153-161.
    11. Fan, Min & Zhou, Yun & Lu, Zhixi & Gao, Sen, 2024. "Fintech's impact on green productivity in China: Role of fossil fuel energy structure, environmental regulations, government expenditure, and R&D investment," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Roper, Stephen & Tapinos, Efstathios, 2016. "Taking risks in the face of uncertainty: An exploratory analysis of green innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 357-363.
    13. Fuqin Zhang & Yue Wang & Wei Liu, 2020. "Science and Technology Resource Allocation, Spatial Association, and Regional Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Mertzanis, Charilaos, 2020. "Financial supervision structure, decentralized decision-making and financing constraints," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 13-37.
    15. Jianwei Li & Na Li & Xiang Cheng & Daqing Gong, 2021. "The Impact of Fintech on Corporate Technology Innovation Based on Driving Effects, Mechanism Identification, and Heterogeneity Analysis," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-12, December.
    16. Nie, Changfei & Ye, Susu & Feng, Yuan, 2024. "Place-based policy and urban green technology innovation: Evidence from the revitalization of old revolutionary base areas in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1257-1272.
    17. Luo, Sumei & Sun, Yongkun & Yang, Fan & Zhou, Guangyou, 2022. "Does fintech innovation promote enterprise transformation? Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Huang, Shuo, 2022. "Does FinTech improve the investment efficiency of enterprises? Evidence from China’s small and medium-sized enterprises," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 571-586.
    19. Xie, Xueyan & Zhu, Xiaoyang, 2022. "FinTech and capital allocation efficiency: Another equity-efficiency dilemma?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    20. Teng, Mingming & Shen, Minghao, 2023. "Fintech and energy efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    21. George, Gerard & Prabhu, Ganesh N., 2003. "Developmental financial institutions as technology policy instruments: implications for innovation and entrepreneurship in emerging economies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 89-108, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bai, Rui & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "An in-depth analysis of green innovation efficiency: New evidence based on club convergence and spatial correlation network," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Wang, Shaohui & Yong, Yanlan & Liu, Xizhang & Wang, Yunliang, 2024. "How Fintech mitigates credit mismatches to promote green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    3. Yucai Hu & Shaorui Du & Yukun Wang & Xinya Yang, 2023. "How Does Green Insurance Affect Green Innovation? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Lu, Yao & Zhan, Shuwei & Zhan, Minghua, 2024. "Has FinTech changed the sensitivity of corporate investment to interest rates?—Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Jiamin Liu & Xiaoyu Ma & Bin Zhao & Qi Cui & Sisi Zhang & Jiaoning Zhang, 2023. "Mandatory Environmental Regulation, Enterprise Labor Demand and Green Innovation Transformation: A Quasi-Experiment from China’s New Environmental Protection Law," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-31, July.
    6. Shang, Hua & Jiang, Li & Pan, Xianyou & Pan, Xiongfeng, 2022. "Green technology innovation spillover effect and urban eco-efficiency convergence: Evidence from Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Rui Ding & Fangcheng Sun, 2023. "Impact of River Chief System on Green Technology Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Jun Dai & Qianyuan Xiao, 2025. "Business Environment Optimization, Digital Transformation, and Enterprises’ Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Guo, Xingfang & Wei, Tao & Wang, Aiping & Hu, Haifeng, 2024. "Corporate governance effects of digital finance: Evidence from corporate tax avoidance in China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).
    10. Jun-liang Du & Yong Liu & Wei-xue Diao, 2019. "Assessing Regional Differences in Green Innovation Efficiency of Industrial Enterprises in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Ge, Wenfeng & Yang, Ping & Pan, Xu & Ran, Qiying, 2024. "Sustainable utilization of mining resources: Exploring the impact of FinTech on green development from the perspective of mining enterprises," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    12. Chuanlin Wang & Guowan Yan & Juan Ou, 2023. "Does Digitization Promote Green Innovation? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-27, February.
    13. Chao Hung Wang, 2020. "An environmental perspective extends market orientation: Green innovation sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3123-3134, December.
    14. Wang, Xin & Ma, Chaoqun & Yao, Zheng, 2024. "The double-edged sword effect of digital capability on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed industrial firms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 321-339.
    15. Feiguo Quan & Liu Liu, 2025. "How Does Fiscal Vertical Imbalance Affect Regional Green Technology Innovation in China—The Moderating Role of Financial Decentralization and Fiscal Transparency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Jing Xu & Dong Chen & Rongrong Liu & Maoxian Zhou & Yunxiao Kong, 2021. "Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation, and Industrial Transformation: An Empirical Study Based on City Function in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    17. Dong, Hanmin & Zhang, Lin & Zheng, Huanhuan, 2024. "Green bonds: Fueling green innovation or just a fad?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    18. Zhang, Jianhua & Liu, Yushan & Zhang, Weihua & Ma, Xinyuan, 2023. "Role of green technologies in enhancing the efficiency of natural resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    19. Hong Xu & Baozhen Liu & Kai Lin & Yunyun Zhang & Bei Liu & Mingjie Xie, 2022. "Towards Carbon Neutrality: Carbon Emission Performance of Science and Technology Finance Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Jun Gao & Ning Xu & Ju Zhou, 2023. "Innovative City Construction and Urban Environmental Performance: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1909-:d:1598371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.