IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1882-d1597530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing Sustainability and Green Energy with Artificial Intelligence: A Turkish English Social Media Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Fahrettin Kayan

    (Department of Marketing and Advertising, Social Sciences Vocational School, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye)

  • Yasemin Bilişli

    (Department of Office Services and Secretariat, Social Sciences Vocational School, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye)

  • Mehmet Kayakuş

    (Department of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07800, Türkiye)

  • Fatma Yiğit Açıkgöz

    (Department of Marketing and Advertising, Social Sciences Vocational School, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye)

  • Agah Başdeğirmen

    (Department of Management and Organisation, Isparta Vocational School, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Isparta 32200, Türkiye)

  • Meltem Güler

    (Department of Communication (External), Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Türkiye)

Abstract

This study explores how linguistic and cultural differences shape social media discourses on green energy and sustainability by analysing English and Turkish tweets. Leveraging artificial intelligence-based text mining methods, the research examines users’ perceptions, emotions, and concerns about green energy on social media platforms. The findings reveal that in both languages, negative sentiments outweigh positive ones, with users frequently expressing their criticisms and apprehensions. However, significant thematic differences emerge based on language and culture. English tweets generally adopt a global and industrial perspective, while Turkish tweets are more focused on local, technical, and operational issues. By integrating sustainability into the analysis, this study highlights the interconnectedness of green energy discussions with broader environmental and societal goals. Social media platforms are shown to play a critical role in raising environmental awareness and influencing consumer perceptions. The results underline the importance of developing sustainability policies that consider regional dynamics, cultural contexts, and user expectations. Additionally, this study provides valuable insights for advancing climate research, media strategies, and digital marketing efforts. Ultimately, it emphasises the need for inclusive, informed, and innovative approaches to foster greener and more sustainable futures globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Fahrettin Kayan & Yasemin Bilişli & Mehmet Kayakuş & Fatma Yiğit Açıkgöz & Agah Başdeğirmen & Meltem Güler, 2025. "Analysing Sustainability and Green Energy with Artificial Intelligence: A Turkish English Social Media Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1882-:d:1597530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatma Yiğit Açikgöz & Mehmet Kayakuş & Bianca-Ștefania Zăbavă & Onder Kabas, 2024. "Brand Reputation and Trust: The Impact on Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty for the Hewlett-Packard Brand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Omer, Abdeen Mustafa, 2008. "Green energies and the environment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(7), pages 1789-1821, September.
    3. Luke Sloan & Jeffrey Morgan & Pete Burnap & Matthew Williams, 2015. "Who Tweets? Deriving the Demographic Characteristics of Age, Occupation and Social Class from Twitter User Meta-Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2009. "Rejecting renewables: The socio-technical impediments to renewable electricity in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4500-4513, November.
    5. Gross, Catherine, 2007. "Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2727-2736, May.
    6. Wolsink, Maarten, 2007. "Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2692-2704, May.
    7. Wüstenhagen, Rolf & Menichetti, Emanuela, 2012. "Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: Conceptual framework and opportunities for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Mehmet Kayakuş & Fatma Yiğit Açikgöz & Mirela Nicoleta Dinca & Onder Kabas, 2024. "Sustainable Brand Reputation: Evaluation of iPhone Customer Reviews with Machine Learning and Sentiment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Johnson, Nils & Krey, Volker & McCollum, David L. & Rao, Shilpa & Riahi, Keywan & Rogelj, Joeri, 2015. "Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 89-102.
    10. Arho Suominen & Hannes Toivanen, 2016. "Map of science with topic modeling: Comparison of unsupervised learning and human-assigned subject classification," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(10), pages 2464-2476, October.
    11. Geraint Ellis & John Barry & Clive Robinson, 2007. "Many ways to say 'no', different ways to say 'yes': Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 517-551.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haggett, Claire, 2011. "Understanding public responses to offshore wind power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 503-510, February.
    2. Petrova, Maria A., 2016. "From NIMBY to acceptance: Toward a novel framework — VESPA — For organizing and interpreting community concerns," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1280-1294.
    3. Cohen, Jed J. & Reichl, Johannes & Schmidthaler, Michael, 2014. "Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 4-9.
    4. Devine-Wright, Patrick & Wiersma, Bouke, 2020. "Understanding community acceptance of a potential offshore wind energy project in different locations: An island-based analysis of ‘place-technology fit’," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    5. Ceglarz, Andrzej & Beneking, Andreas & Ellenbeck, Saskia & Battaglini, Antonella, 2017. "Understanding the role of trust in power line development projects: Evidence from two case studies in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 570-580.
    6. Langer, Katharina & Decker, Thomas & Roosen, Jutta & Menrad, Klaus, 2016. "A qualitative analysis to understand the acceptance of wind energy in Bavaria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 248-259.
    7. Polzin, Friedemann, 2017. "Mobilizing private finance for low-carbon innovation – A systematic review of barriers and solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 525-535.
    8. Songsore, Emmanuel & Buzzelli, Michael, 2014. "Social responses to wind energy development in Ontario: The influence of health risk perceptions and associated concerns," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 285-296.
    9. Bauwens, Thomas, 2019. "Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: Findings and policy implications from Flanders," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 841-852.
    10. József Kádár & Martina Pilloni & Tareq Abu Hamed, 2023. "A Survey of Renewable Energy, Climate Change, and Policy Awareness in Israel: The Long Path for Citizen Participation in the National Renewable Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Mouter, Niek & de Geest, Auke & Doorn, Neelke, 2018. "A values-based approach to energy controversies: Value-sensitive design applied to the Groningen gas controversy in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 639-648.
    12. David Rudolph & Claire Haggett & Mhairi Aitken, 2018. "Community benefits from offshore renewables: The relationship between different understandings of impact, community, and benefit," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 92-117, February.
    13. Gorsevski, Pece V. & Cathcart, Steven C. & Mirzaei, Golrokh & Jamali, Mohsin M. & Ye, Xinyue & Gomezdelcampo, Enrique, 2013. "A group-based spatial decision support system for wind farm site selection in Northwest Ohio," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 374-385.
    14. Pepermans, Yves & Loots, Ilse, 2013. "Wind farm struggles in Flanders fields: A sociological perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 321-328.
    15. Kontogianni, A. & Tourkolias, Ch. & Skourtos, M. & Damigos, D., 2014. "Planning globally, protesting locally: Patterns in community perceptions towards the installation of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 170-177.
    16. Dessi, F. & Ariccio, S. & Albers, T. & Alves, S. & Ludovico, N. & Bonaiuto, M., 2022. "Sustainable technology acceptability: Mapping technological, contextual, and social-psychological determinants of EU stakeholders’ biofuel acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    17. D׳Souza, Clare & Yiridoe, Emmanuel K., 2014. "Social acceptance of wind energy development and planning in rural communities of Australia: A consumer analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 262-270.
    18. van Rensburg, Thomas M. & Kelley, Hugh & Jeserich, Nadine, 2015. "What influences the probability of wind farm planning approval: Evidence from Ireland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 12-22.
    19. Aitken, Mhairi, 2010. "Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6066-6075, October.
    20. Yenneti, Komali & Day, Rosie, 2015. "Procedural (in)justice in the implementation of solar energy: The case of Charanaka solar park, Gujarat, India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 664-673.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1882-:d:1597530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.