IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1779-d1595449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lifecycle Assessment and Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Sustainable Concrete Incorporating Recycled Aggregates

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Zheng

    (CCCC Urban Construction (Sichuan) Co., Ltd., Chengdu 611100, China)

  • Qian Li

    (CCCC Urban Construction (Sichuan) Co., Ltd., Chengdu 611100, China)

  • Ling Zhou

    (School of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211800, China)

  • Fei Gao

    (School of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211800, China)

  • Zuiliang Deng

    (Shanghai Sunrise Polymer Materials Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200231, China)

  • Jun Wang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211800, China)

  • Zhanggen Guo

    (School of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211800, China)

  • Haixia Ding

    (School of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211800, China)

Abstract

In recent decades, the construction industry in China has experienced significant growth, leading to substantial consumption of non-renewable natural resources and a large amount of construction and demolition waste (CDW). As a result, the effective utilization of CDW has become critically important in China. This study focuses on the processing of CDW to produce recycled fine aggregates (RFAs) and recycled coarse aggregates (RCAs), which were subsequently used to produce recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). A total of 12 RAC composites incorporating RFAs and RCAs were prepared, and their compressive strength was evaluated in detail. The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was employed to assess the environmental impact of 1 m 3 of RAC within a “cradle-to-gate” system boundary. Furthermore, the life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) method was applied to evaluate the economic benefits of RAC. The contributions of RCAs and RFAs were analyzed in detail. Lastly, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach was proposed to comprehensively compare the environmental and economic impacts of RAC and ordinary concrete. The results of the LCA and LCCA indicate that the inclusion of RCAs and RFAs in composite mixtures leads to significant environmental and economic benefits. The MCDA identified the optimized RAC mixture as one containing 70% RCA and 100% RFA, which demonstrated the best performance in terms of mechanical properties, environmental impact, and economic cost. The composite addition of RCA and RFA in RAC production can significantly reduce both environmental impacts and economic costs, thereby enhancing the sustainability of the concrete industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Zheng & Qian Li & Ling Zhou & Fei Gao & Zuiliang Deng & Jun Wang & Zhanggen Guo & Haixia Ding, 2025. "Lifecycle Assessment and Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Sustainable Concrete Incorporating Recycled Aggregates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1779-:d:1595449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tereza Pavlů & Vladimír Kočí & Petr Hájek, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of Two Use Cycles of Recycled Aggregate Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Chenxi Lin & Yidan Sun & Wenxiu Jiao & Jiajie Zheng & Zhijuan Li & Shujun Zhang, 2023. "Prediction of Compressive Strength and Elastic Modulus for Recycled Aggregate Concrete Based on AutoGluon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-40, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaime A. Mesa & Carlos Fúquene-Retamoso & Aníbal Maury-Ramírez, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Wenqiang Xing & Zhihe Cheng & Xianzhang Ling & Liang Tang & Shengyi Cong & Shaowei Wei & Lin Geng, 2022. "Bearing Properties and Stability Analysis of the Slope Protection Framework Using Recycled Railway Sleepers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Najib N. Gerges & Camille A. Issa & Elias Sleiman & Sara Aintrazi & Jad Saadeddine & Remi Abboud & Marc Antoun, 2022. "Eco-Friendly Optimum Structural Concrete Mix Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Chunhong Chen & Ronggui Liu & Pinghua Zhu & Hui Liu & Xinjie Wang, 2020. "Carbonization Durability of Two Generations of Recycled Coarse Aggregate Concrete with Effect of Chloride Ion Corrosion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Yong Liu & Yang Wang & Mengmeng Zhou & Jiandong Huang, 2023. "Improvement of Computational Efficiency and Accuracy by Firefly Algorithm and Random Forest for Compressive Strength Modeling of Recycled Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Caroline Santana Rangel & Mayara Amario & Marco Pepe & Enzo Martinelli & Romildo Dias Toledo Filho, 2020. "Durability of Structural Recycled Aggregate Concrete Subjected to Freeze-Thaw Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1779-:d:1595449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.