Author
Listed:
- Bruna Moura
(Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, R. do Mirante 258, 4415-491 Grijó, Portugal)
- Tiago Ramos da Silva
(Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, R. do Mirante 258, 4415-491 Grijó, Portugal)
- Nelson Soares
(University of Coimbra, ADAI, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rua Luís Reis Santos, Pólo II, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal)
- Helena Monteiro
(Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, R. do Mirante 258, 4415-491 Grijó, Portugal)
Abstract
Given the current need to improve the thermal and energy performance of buildings, special attention has been given to the building envelope and materials. Concrete sandwich panels (CSPs) are versatile composite construction elements whose popularity is increasing given their properties, e.g., good thermal and acoustic insulation, durability, and fire resistance. Nevertheless, besides their properties, it is important to evaluate the sustainability of composite panels under development. This work aims to assess the eco-efficiency of six CSPs with distinct insulation materials: lightweight concrete (LWC), cork, glass wool, and expanded polystyrene (EPS). Coupling both life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) analysis, this study derives eco-efficiency indicators to inform decisions regarding CSP environmental and economic performances. The results of the LCA and LCC showed that the high-performance concrete (HPC) layer was the main hotspot of the CSPs in all scenarios. Moreover, the best scenario changed when different environmental impact categories were considered. Thus, using multiple environmental indicators is recommended to avoid problem-shifting. Considering the final cost, the CSP with cork is the most expensive panel to produce, with the other five options having very similar manufacturing prices. On average, raw material inputs, labour, and material delivery account for 62.9%, 18.1%, and 17.1% of the total costs, respectively. Regarding the eco-efficiency results, the most eco-efficient scenario changed with the environmental indicator used. Cork seems to be the best option when considering the carbon footprint of the panels, whereas when considering other environmental indicators, the recycled EPS scenario has the best eco-efficiency and the CSP with cork the worst.
Suggested Citation
Bruna Moura & Tiago Ramos da Silva & Nelson Soares & Helena Monteiro, 2025.
"Eco-Efficiency of Concrete Sandwich Panels with Different Insulation Core Materials,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1687-:d:1593676
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1687-:d:1593676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.