IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1670-d1593229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Risk Management in the Final Operational Stage of Sterile Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: A Case Study Highlighting the Management of Sustainable Related Risks in Product Sterilization, Inspection, Labeling, Packaging, and Storage Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Bassam Elmadhoun

    (Pharmaceutical Solution Industry Co., Ltd., Jeddah 21484, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rawidh Alsaidalani

    (Division of Molecular Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, 2409 University Ave, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • Frank Burczynski

    (College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada)

Abstract

Quality risk management, commonly known as QRM, is designed to systematically assess, control, communicate, and review potential risks at every stage of the pharmaceutical manufacturing process. The preservation of consistent product quality across the entirety of the product’s life cycle is of paramount importance. The aim of this article is to formulate a best practice guide that will assist pharmaceutical manufacturers in comprehending and implementing the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Q9: quality risk management principles. A widely recognized methodology for defining and monitoring risk mitigation strategies within the pharmaceutical sector is the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). ICH Q9 does not, however, offer detailed instructions for applying FMEA to real-world pharmaceutical situations. We previously provided real-world case studies that identify and mitigate risks in the early stages of the manufacturing process of sterile products, such as (1) supply chain and procurement; (2) logistics and warehousing; (3) raw material dispensing; (4) glass bottle washing and handling; (5) product filling; and (6) final product receiving and handling. The final steps of the sterile manufacturing process are the subject of the case study we present in this paper. We identify and control the risks related to (I) product sterilization; (II) product inspection, labeling, and packaging; (III) the finished product’s transfer to storage; and (IV) storing finished products in a warehouse. In order to maximize decision-making and reduce the risk of regulatory noncompliance, this case study describes a proactive strategy for the identification, management, and communication of risks associated with crucial tasks. While each organization’s products and methods are distinct, with varying tolerances for risk, certain stages and associated risks are common. Consequently, the examples provided here offer relevant insights into any pharmaceutical production environment. Managing sustainability-related risks and ensuring the transparency of pharmaceutical company operations are key tasks of success today. These risks, if not managed, will cause serious problems and a negative reputation, as well as environmental and public impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Bassam Elmadhoun & Rawidh Alsaidalani & Frank Burczynski, 2025. "Quality Risk Management in the Final Operational Stage of Sterile Pharmaceutical Manufacturing: A Case Study Highlighting the Management of Sustainable Related Risks in Product Sterilization, Inspecti," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1670-:d:1593229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1670/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1670/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rawidh Alsaidalani & Bassam Elmadhoun, 2022. "Quality Risk Management in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Operations: Case Study for Sterile Product Filling and Final Product Handling Stage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1670-:d:1593229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.