IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1539-d1590100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Multidimensional Valuation and Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Resources in the Pearl River–Xijiang Economic Belt, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhantu Chen

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Processes and Remediation in Ecologically Fragile Regions, College of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
    University Engineering Research Center of Green Remediation and Low Carbon Development for Lijiang River Basin, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Lulu Deng

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Yiman Chen

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Processes and Remediation in Ecologically Fragile Regions, College of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Feili Wei

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Processes and Remediation in Ecologically Fragile Regions, College of Environment and Resources, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China
    University Engineering Research Center of Green Remediation and Low Carbon Development for Lijiang River Basin, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China)

Abstract

Revealing the multidimensional value and spatial distribution of cultivated land (CL) resources is crucial for formulating scientific and reasonable CL protection policies and regional ecological supplements. This study takes the Pearl River–Xijiang Economic Belt (PRXJEB), China, as the study area, calculates the economic, social, ecological, and comprehensive values of CL resources based on the county scale, and analyzes the spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of CL resource value so as to provide a reference for protecting CL resources in the PRXJEB and promoting the healthy and scientific development of the economic belt. The income reduction method, alternative market method, and equivalent factor method were applied to calculate the economic, social, and ecological values of CL resources in 88 counties in 2021, respectively. Furthermore, spatial autocorrelation analysis was employed to reveal their distribution characteristics and influencing factors. The results show that (1) there are significant differences in the value of CL resources in the counties of the PRXJEB, and the value of CL resources is generally low. (2) The value of CL resources in the PRXJEB generally follows a distribution pattern of “higher in the east and lower in the west”. (3) The value of CL resources in the PRXJEB is mainly affected by natural conditions and the level of socio-economic development. Therefore, in view of the low value of CL resources and its spatial differentiation characteristics in the PRXJEB, it is recommended to strengthen land consolidation and improve the quality of CL, improve CL infrastructure and strengthen the introduction of agricultural science and technology, enhance policies to benefit farmers, and adjust farmers’ behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhantu Chen & Lulu Deng & Yiman Chen & Feili Wei, 2025. "Research on the Multidimensional Valuation and Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Resources in the Pearl River–Xijiang Economic Belt, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1539-:d:1590100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1539/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1539/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monika Balawejder & Artur Warchoł & Kalle Konttinen, 2023. "Energy Efficiency in Agricultural Production—Experience from Land Consolidation in Poland and Finland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-29, November.
    2. Zhantu Chen & Li Ren & Ling Xie & Qiong Xiao, 2023. "Multidimensional Valuation and Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Resources at the County Scale: A Case Study of Guangxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Turner, Katrine Grace & Anderson, Sharolyn & Gonzales-Chang, Mauricio & Costanza, Robert & Courville, Sasha & Dalgaard, Tommy & Dominati, Estelle & Kubiszewski, Ida & Ogilvy, Sue & Porfirio, Luciana &, 2016. "A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 190-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Smiraglia & Luca Salvati & Gianluca Egidi & Rosanna Salvia & Antonio Giménez-Morera & Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, 2021. "Toward a New Urban Cycle? A Closer Look to Sprawl, Demographic Transitions and the Environment in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Mohamed A. M. Abd Elbasit & Jasper Knight & Gang Liu & Majed M. Abu-Zreig & Rashid Hasaan, 2021. "Valuation of Ecosystem Services in South Africa, 2001–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Ahimbisibwe, Vianny & Zhunusova, Eliza & Kassa, Habtemariam & Günter, Sven, 2024. "Technical efficiency drivers of farmer-led restoration strategies, and how substantial is the unrealised potential for farm output?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Wenbo Cai & Wei Jiang & Hongyu Du & Ruishan Chen & Yongli Cai, 2021. "Assessing Ecosystem Services Supply-Demand (Mis)Matches for Differential City Management in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Chenxi Li & Zhihong Zong & Haichao Qie & Yingying Fang & Qiao Liu, 2023. "CiteSpace and Bibliometric Analysis of Published Research on Forest Ecosystem Services for the Period 2018–2022," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Yuqing Zhao & Zenglin Han & Xiaolu Yan & Xuezhe Wang, 2022. "Integrating Spatial Heterogeneity into an Analysis between Ecosystem Service Value and Its Driving Factors: A Case Study of Dalian, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    8. Andrea Nóblega-Carriquiry & Hug March & David Sauri, 2022. "Community Acceptance of Nature-Based Solutions in the Delta of the Tordera River, Catalonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Tony Reyhanloo & Stefan Baumgärtner & Matthias Haeni & Simone Quatrini & Philippe Saner & Eike von Lindern, 2018. "Private-sector investor’s intention and motivation to invest in Land Degradation Neutrality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Gudrun Schwilch & Tatenda Lemann & Örjan Berglund & Carlo Camarotto & Artemi Cerdà & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Silvia Kohnová & Dominika Krzeminska & Teodoro Marañón & René Rietra & Grzegorz Siebiele, 2018. "Assessing Impacts of Soil Management Measures on Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, November.
    11. Tayyebi, Amin & Arsanjani, Jamal J. & Tayyebi, Amir H. & Omrani, Hichem & Moghadam, Hossein S., 2016. "Group-based crop change planning: Application of SmartScape™ spatial decision support system for resolving conflicts," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 333(C), pages 92-100.
    12. Weixuan Wei & Yiqi Wang & Qi Yan & Guanpeng Liu & Nannan Dong, 2024. "Assessing Buffer Gradient Synergies: Comparing Objective and Subjective Evaluations of Urban Park Ecosystem Services in Century Park, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-33, November.
    13. Tianyi Cai & Xueyuan Luo & Liyao Fan & Jing Han & Xinhuan Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Cropland Use Changes on Terrestrial Ecosystem Services Value in Newly Added Cropland Hotspots in China during 2000–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Ida Kubiszewski & Sharolyn J. Anderson & Robert Costanza & Paul C. Sutton, 2016. "The Future of Ecosystem Services in Asia and the Pacific," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(3), pages 389-404, September.
    15. Maia de Souza, Danielle & Lopes, Gabriela Russo & Hansson, Julia & Hansen, Karin, 2018. "Ecosystem services in life cycle assessment: A synthesis of knowledge and recommendations for biofuels," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PB), pages 200-210.
    16. Raviv, Orna & Shiri, Zemah-Shamir & Ido, Izhaki & Alon, Lotan, 2021. "The effect of wildfire and land-cover changes on the economic value of ecosystem services in Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve, Israel," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    17. Artur Warchoł & Karolina Pęzioł & Marek Baścik, 2024. "Energy-Saving Geospatial Data Storage—LiDAR Point Cloud Compression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-28, December.
    18. Xiangjian Rui & Lei Nie & Yan Xu & Hong Wang, 2019. "Land Degeneration due to Water Infiltration and Sub-Erosion: A Case Study of Soil Slope Failure at the National Geological Park of Qian-an Mud Forest, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Costanza, Robert, 2020. "Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    20. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1539-:d:1590100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.