Author
Listed:
- Jan Kamiński
(Faculty of Science and Health, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)
- Ewa Głowienka
(Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)
- Dawid Soszyński
(Faculty of Science and Health, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)
- Ewa Trzaskowska
(Faculty of Science and Health, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)
- Tomasz Stuczyński
(Faculty of Science and Health, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)
- Grzegorz Siebielec
(Department of Soil Science and Environmental Analyses, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation—State Research Institute (IUNG), 24-100 Puławy, Poland)
- Ludwika Poręba
(Department of Soil Science and Environmental Analyses, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation—State Research Institute (IUNG), 24-100 Puławy, Poland)
Abstract
This study aimed to develop criteria for the expert assessment of the visual attractiveness of informal urban green spaces and compare these results with indicators derived from spectral indices and geospatial data. The research was conducted in Lublin, Poland, a medium-sized European city. The expert assessment evaluated the overall attractiveness, naturalness, landscape contrast, and uniqueness. The results were juxtaposed with spectral indices, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Leaf Area Index (LAI), and land surface temperature, which were calculated for the target areas and a 300 m buffer surrounding them. The analyses revealed strong correlations between the expert ratings and spectral indices. For example, overall attractiveness was linked to lower temperatures, while landscape contrast exhibited a relationship with temperature differentials. Moreover, areas with greater landscape contrast showed larger index differences between the site and the buffer. Positive correlations were also observed between attractiveness and land slope. Importantly, the spectral indices highlighted the ecological value of some sites that received lower expert assessments, such as areas dominated by shrubs and bushes. This research introduces the concept of ‘enchanted natural places’ (ENPs) as a framework for identifying and formalizing the protection of visually and ecologically valuable, informal green spaces. The integration of expert evaluations with spectral data provides a novel, robust methodology for assessing urban green spaces, bridging subjective perceptions and objective environmental indicators. This approach underscores the importance of informal green spaces not only for aesthetic and ecological benefits but also for supporting biodiversity and mitigating urban heat islands, contributing to urban resilience in the face of climate change.
Suggested Citation
Jan Kamiński & Ewa Głowienka & Dawid Soszyński & Ewa Trzaskowska & Tomasz Stuczyński & Grzegorz Siebielec & Ludwika Poręba, 2025.
"Integrating Expert Assessments and Spectral Methods to Evaluate Visual Attractiveness and Ecosystem Services of Urban Informal Green Spaces in the Context of Climate Adaptation,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-23, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1349-:d:1585584
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1349-:d:1585584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.