IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1121-d1580254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Interpretable Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Tax Management in the Manufacturing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Han

    (Business School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Wen Xu

    (School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK)

  • Qian Song

    (Business School, Loughborough University, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Kai Zhao

    (School of Engineering and Architecture, University College Cork, T12 HW58 Cork, Ireland)

  • Yao Xu

    (Business School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

Abstract

The long-term development of the manufacturing industry relies on sustainable tax management, which plays a key role in optimizing production costs. While artificial intelligence models have been applied to tax-related predictions, research on their application for predicting tax management levels is quite limited, with no studies focused on the manufacturing industry in China. To enhance digital innovation in corporate management, this study applies interpretable artificial intelligence models to predict the tax management level, which helps decision-makers maintain it within a sustainable range. The ratio of total tax expense to total profits (ETR) is used to represent the tax management level, which is predicted using decision trees, random forests, linear regression, support vector regression, and artificial neural networks with eight input features. Comparisons among the developed models indicate that the random forest model exhibits the best performance in terms of prediction accuracy and generalization capability. Additionally, the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) technique is integrated with the developed model to enhance the interpretability of its predictions. The SHAP results reveal the importance of the input features and also highlight the dominance of certain features. The results show that the ETR from the previous year holds the greatest importance, being more than twice as significant as the second most important factor, whereas the effect of board size is negligible. Moreover, benefiting from the local interpretations using SHAP values, this approach aids managers in making rational tax management decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Han & Wen Xu & Qian Song & Kai Zhao & Yao Xu, 2025. "Application of Interpretable Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Tax Management in the Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1121-:d:1580254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Olhoft Rego, 2003. "Tax†Avoidance Activities of U.S. Multinational Corporations," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 805-833, December.
    2. Ahmed K. Abd El Aal & Hossam M. GabAllah & Hanaa A. Megahed & Maha K. Selim & Mahmoud A. Hegab & Mohamed E. Fadl & Nazih Y. Rebouh & Heba El-Bagoury, 2024. "Geo-Environmental Risk Assessment of Sand Dunes Encroachment Hazards in Arid Lands Using Machine Learning Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Liang, Quanxi & Li, Qiumei & Lu, Meiting & Shan, Yaowen, 2021. "Industry and geographic peer effects on corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Lee, Namryoung & Swenson, Charles, 2016. "Effects of overseas subsidiaries on worldwide corporate taxes," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 47-59.
    5. Jasmien, Lismont & Cardinaels, Eddy & Bruynseels, L.M.L. & De Groote, Sander & Baesens, B. & Lemahieu, W. & Vanthienen, J., 2018. "Predicting tax avoidance by means of social network analytics," Other publications TiSEM 8eb577ff-407b-4fb0-b679-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Esraa Faisal Malik & Khai Wah Khaw & Bahari Belaton & Wai Peng Wong & XinYing Chew, 2022. "Credit Card Fraud Detection Using a New Hybrid Machine Learning Architecture," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Yoojin Shin & Jung-Mi Park, 2023. "The Effect of a Company’s Sustainable Competitive Advantage on Their Tax Avoidance Strategy—Focusing on Market Competition in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Alfonso Marino & Paolo Pariso & Michele Picariello, 2024. "Organizational and Energy Efficiency Analysis of Italian Hospitals and Identification of Improving AI Solutions," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 628-640, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erin Henry & Richard Sansing, 2018. "Corporate tax avoidance: data truncation and loss firms," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1042-1070, September.
    2. Behnam Karamshahi & Zeinab Azami & Tabandeh Salehi, 2018. "The association between competition power in markets and tax avoidance: evidence from Tehran stock exchange," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(3), pages 323-339, September.
    3. Bing Wang & Kung‐Cheng Ho & Xinyu Liu & Yan Gu, 2022. "Industry cash flow volatility and stock price crash risk," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 356-371, March.
    4. Athira, A. & Ramesh, Vishnu K., 2023. "COVID-19 and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(4).
    5. M.A. Gulzar & Jacob Cherian & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Alina Badulescu & Phung Anh Thu & Daniel Badulescu & Nguyen Vinh Khuong, 2018. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Corporate Tax Avoidance of Chinese Listed Companies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Habib Saragih, Arfah & Ali, Syaiful & Suwardi, Eko & Utomo, Hargo, 2024. "Finding the missing pieces to an optimal corporate tax savings: Information technology governance and internal information quality," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    7. Li, John, 2022. "The effect of employee satisfaction on effective corporate tax planning: Evidence from Glassdoor," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    8. Chen, Meian & Zhao, Ke & Jin, Wei, 2024. "Corporate digital transformation and tax avoidance: evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    9. Abdul Wahab, Nor Shaipah & Holland, Kevin, 2012. "Tax planning, corporate governance and equity value," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 111-124.
    10. Gu, Xin & Ying, Shan & Wang, Liangliang & Yu, Zhen & Sharma, Susan Sunila, 2021. "A new estimation of institutional informed trading and firm transparency: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Qingyuan Li & Edward L. Maydew & Richard H. Willis & Li Xu, 2023. "Taxes and director independence: evidence from board reforms worldwide," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 910-957, June.
    12. Osswald, Benjamin, 2018. "Corporate tax planning and firms' information environment," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 236, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    13. Egger, Peter H. & Strecker, Nora M. & Zoller-Rydzek, Benedikt, 2020. "Estimating bargaining-related tax advantages of multinational firms," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Cristi A. Gleason & Sascha Kieback & Martin Thomsen & Christoph Watrin, 2021. "Monitoring or payroll maximization? What happens when workers enter the boardroom?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1046-1087, September.
    15. Apostol, Oana & Pop, Alina, 2019. "‘Paying taxes is losing money’: A qualitative study on institutional logics in the tax consultancy field in Romania," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-23.
    16. Jay Raval & Pronaya Bhattacharya & Nilesh Kumar Jadav & Sudeep Tanwar & Gulshan Sharma & Pitshou N. Bokoro & Mitwalli Elmorsy & Amr Tolba & Maria Simona Raboaca, 2023. "RaKShA : A Trusted Explainable LSTM Model to Classify Fraud Patterns on Credit Card Transactions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, April.
    17. Yicheng Wang & Brian Wright, 2024. "Tax-strategy-related words, firm’s ability, and tax avoidance," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 685-713, December.
    18. Xiaoxu Zhang & Xinyu Du, 2023. "Industry and Regional Peer Effects in Corporate Digital Transformation: The Moderating Effects of TMT Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    19. Tang, Wenliang & Yang, Mian & Duan, Hongbo, 2023. "Temperature and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    20. Martin Jacob & Anna Rohlfing-Bastian & Kai Sandner, 2021. "Why do not all firms engage in tax avoidance?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 459-495, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1121-:d:1580254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.