IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p802-d1571984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model of Discrete-Time Surplus Process for Scheme of Productive Waqf Integration with Sustainable Fishermen’s Welfare Benefits Based on Several Threshold Levels: Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Rini Cahyandari

    (Doctoral Program in Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Sukono

    (Departement of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Riaman

    (Departement of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Nurnadiah Zamri

    (Faculty of Informatics and Computing, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Besut Campus, Besut 22200, Terengganu, Malaysia)

Abstract

Insurance companies are at risk of bankruptcy when their surplus becomes negative, making it necessary to observe the evolution of the surplus over time. In this study, the surplus evolution is assumed to be discrete, based on the fiscal year period. This study examines the surplus model in sharia insurance schemes, focusing on identifying shortcomings in existing models and developing a framework based on community needs. Specifically, this study highlights the potential integration of productive waqf with welfare benefits for fishermen. A systematic review was conducted by collecting scientific works from the Scopus, ScienceDirect, Dimensions, and Google Scholar databases, selected using the PRISMA approach. The results indicate that existing surplus models in sharia insurance schemes remain general and do not address specific community needs, such as fishermen’s welfare. This study provides insights into developing more inclusive and innovative surplus models by integrating productive waqf. These findings are expected to encourage the development of sharia insurance schemes oriented toward sustainability and improving fishermen’s welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Rini Cahyandari & Sukono & Riaman & Nurnadiah Zamri, 2025. "Model of Discrete-Time Surplus Process for Scheme of Productive Waqf Integration with Sustainable Fishermen’s Welfare Benefits Based on Several Threshold Levels: Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:802-:d:1571984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Avanzi, 2009. "Strategies for Dividend Distribution: A Review," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 217-251.
    2. Rini Cahyandari & Kalfin & Sukono & Sri Purwani & Dewi Ratnasari & Titin Herawati & Sutiono Mahdi, 2023. "The Development of Sharia Insurance and Its Future Sustainability in Risk Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Dufresne, Francois & Gerber, Hans U., 1991. "Risk theory for the compound Poisson process that is perturbed by diffusion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 51-59, March.
    4. Gerber, Hans U. & Goovaerts, Marc J. & Kaas, Rob, 1987. "On the Probability and Severity of Ruin," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 151-163, November.
    5. Dila Puspita & Adam Kolkiewicz & Ken Seng Tan, 2020. "Discrete Time Ruin Probability for Takaful (Islamic Insurance) with Investment and Qard-Hasan (Benevolent Loan) Activities," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Willmot, Gordon E., 1993. "Ruin probabilities in the compound binomial model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 133-142, April.
    7. Gerber, Hans U., 1988. "Mathematical Fun with the Compound Binomial Process," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 161-168, November.
    8. Hans Gerber & Elias Shiu, 1998. "On the Time Value of Ruin," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 48-72.
    9. Sung Soo Kim & Steve Drekic, 2016. "Ruin Analysis of a Discrete-Time Dependent Sparre Andersen Model with External Financial Activities and Randomized Dividends," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Dickson, David C. M. & Hipp, Christian, 2001. "On the time to ruin for Erlang(2) risk processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 333-344, December.
    11. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Smith, Nathaniel, 2006. "Maximizing Dividends without Bankruptcy," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 5-23, May.
    12. Hans Gerber & Elias Shiu, 2005. "The Time Value of Ruin in a Sparre Andersen Model," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 49-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dutang, C. & Lefèvre, C. & Loisel, S., 2013. "On an asymptotic rule A+B/u for ultimate ruin probabilities under dependence by mixing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 774-785.
    2. Jae-Kyung Woo & Haibo Liu, 2018. "Discounted Aggregate Claim Costs Until Ruin in the Discrete-Time Renewal Risk Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1285-1318, December.
    3. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Yang, Hailiang, 2013. "Valuing equity-linked death benefits in jump diffusion models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 615-623.
    4. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Yang, Hailiang, 2010. "An elementary approach to discrete models of dividend strategies," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 109-116, February.
    5. Palmowski, Zbigniew & Ramsden, Lewis & Papaioannou, Apostolos D., 2024. "Gerber-Shiu theory for discrete risk processes in a regime switching environment," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    6. S. X. Liu & J. Y. Guo, 2006. "Discrete Risk Model Revisited," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 303-313, June.
    7. Schmidli, Hanspeter, 2010. "On the Gerber-Shiu function and change of measure," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 3-11, February.
    8. Kolkovska, Ekaterina T. & Martín-González, Ehyter M., 2016. "Gerber–Shiu functionals for classical risk processes perturbed by an α-stable motion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 22-28.
    9. Albrecher, Hansjörg & Constantinescu, Corina & Pirsic, Gottlieb & Regensburger, Georg & Rosenkranz, Markus, 2010. "An algebraic operator approach to the analysis of Gerber-Shiu functions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 42-51, February.
    10. Li, Shuanming & Garrido, José, 2002. "On the time value of ruin in the discrete time risk model," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB wb021812, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    11. Cheung, Eric C.K., 2011. "A generalized penalty function in Sparre Andersen risk models with surplus-dependent premium," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 384-397, May.
    12. Zhimin Zhang & Hailiang Yang & Hu Yang, 2012. "On a Sparre Andersen Risk Model with Time-Dependent Claim Sizes and Jump-Diffusion Perturbation," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 973-995, December.
    13. Pavlova, Kristina P. & Willmot, Gordon E., 2004. "The discrete stationary renewal risk model and the Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 267-277, October.
    14. Albrecher, Hansjorg & Boxma, Onno J., 2005. "On the discounted penalty function in a Markov-dependent risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 650-672, December.
    15. Ren, Jiandong, 2009. "A connection between the discounted and non-discounted expected penalty functions in the Sparre Andersen risk model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 324-330, February.
    16. Ambagaspitiya, Rohana S., 2009. "Ultimate ruin probability in the Sparre Andersen model with dependent claim sizes and claim occurrence times," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 464-472, June.
    17. Aleksandar Arandjelovi'c & Julia Eisenberg, 2024. "Reinsurance with neural networks," Papers 2408.06168, arXiv.org.
    18. Cheung, Eric C.K. & Landriault, David & Willmot, Gordon E. & Woo, Jae-Kyung, 2010. "Structural properties of Gerber-Shiu functions in dependent Sparre Andersen models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 117-126, February.
    19. Gerber, Hans U. & Landry, Bruno, 1998. "On the discounted penalty at ruin in a jump-diffusion and the perpetual put option," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 263-276, July.
    20. He, Yue & Kawai, Reiichiro & Shimizu, Yasutaka & Yamazaki, Kazutoshi, 2023. "The Gerber-Shiu discounted penalty function: A review from practical perspectives," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:802-:d:1571984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.