IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p763-d1570611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Livelihood Capital Affects Farmers’ Green Production Behavior: Analysis of Mediating Effects Based on Farmers’ Cognition

Author

Listed:
  • Jieyu Yang

    (College of Finance and Economics, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Xiujuan Cui

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

Abstract

In light of global climate change and sustainable agricultural growth, it is critical to look at producers’ green production methods. Enhancing the quality of agricultural goods and reducing agricultural pollution are the main goals of future agricultural growth, and this is accomplished by farmers using green production methods. Regarding the research data of 364 vegetable farmers, this study uses structural equation modeling and a mediation effect model to empirically assess the effect of livelihood capital and farmers’ cognition on their green behavior. The results show that (1) natural capital, human capital, financial capital, and social capital in the livelihood capital of vegetable growers may significantly impact producers’ green production behavior. It is not immediately clear how physical capital affects the way green manufacturing practices work. (2) Natural capital and green production behavior are completely mediated by environmental and policy cognition, while human capital and green production behavior are partly mediated by environmental and policy cognition. Human and natural capital indirectly influence farmers’ sustainable production techniques via these activities. Financial and social capital directly influence farmers’ sustainable production methods, with no mediation effect seen. (3) Farmers’ green production behavior is more significantly influenced by their cognitive behavior than by their livelihood capital. Accordingly, it is recommended that environmental education and policy promotion be strengthened, that farmers’ livelihood capital be accumulated via a variety of channels, that farmers’ subsidies for green production be increased, and that farmers’ knowledge of green production be improved. The cognitive level of farmers should also be raised. In addition to providing theoretical justification for analyzing farmers’ green production practices within the framework of sustainable agricultural development, this study also acts as a guide for pertinent government agencies to help farmers choose more ecologically friendly farming methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Jieyu Yang & Xiujuan Cui, 2025. "How Livelihood Capital Affects Farmers’ Green Production Behavior: Analysis of Mediating Effects Based on Farmers’ Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:763-:d:1570611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/763/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/763/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bravo-Monroy, L. & Potts, S.G. & Tzanopoulos, J., 2016. "Drivers influencing farmer decisions for adopting organic or conventional coffee management practices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 49-61.
    2. Dan Qiao & Shuting Xu & Tao Xu & Qinchuan Hao & Zhen Zhong, 2022. "Gap between Willingness and Behaviors: Understanding the Consistency of Farmers’ Green Production in Hainan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Zejun He & Yunfei Jia & Yifan Ji, 2023. "Analysis of Influencing Factors and Mechanism of Farmers’ Green Production Behaviors in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Xingling Jiang & Yong Sun & Mou Shen & Lixia Tang, 2024. "How Does Developing Green Agriculture Affect Poverty? Evidence from China’s Prefecture-Level Cities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Yunlong Sui & Qiang Gao, 2023. "Farmers’ Endowments, Technology Perception and Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Bo Liu & Na Li & Cairong Liao, 2024. "Effects of Social Capital on the Adoption of Green Production Technologies by Rice Farmers: Moderation Effects Based on Risk Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Jordán, Cristian & Speelman, Stijn, 2020. "On-farm adoption of irrigation technologies in two irrigated valleys in Central Chile: The effect of relative abundance of water resources," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    8. Tianshu Quan & Weiguo Jia & Tianli Quan & Yuyun Xu, 2024. "Impact of Farmers’ Participation in the Transformation of the Farmland Transfer Market on the Adoption of Agricultural Green Production Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yong Liu & Jixin Yang & Guanghong Zhang & Xufeng Cui, 2024. "Driving factors of green production behaviour among farmers of different scales: Evidence from North China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(10), pages 474-494.
    2. repec:caa:jnlage:v:preprint:id:188-2024-agricecon is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Yu, Yanan & He, Yong & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Impact of demand information sharing on organic farming adoption: An evolutionary game approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    4. Xuezhen Xu & Fang Wang & Tao Xu & Sufyan Ullah Khan, 2023. "How Does Capital Endowment Impact Farmers’ Green Production Behavior? Perspectives on Ecological Cognition and Environmental Regulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Michael Mensah & Grace B. Villamor & Benedicta Y. Fosu-Mensah & Paul L. G. Vlek, 2021. "Exploring the Gender-Specific Adaptive Responses to Climate Variability: Application of Grazing Game in the Semi-Arid Region of Ghana," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Gonzalo Villa‐Cox & Francesco Cavazza & Cristian Jordan & Mijail Arias‐Hidalgo & Paúl Herrera & Ramon Espinel & Davide Viaggi & Stijn Speelman, 2021. "Understanding constraints on private irrigation adoption decisions under uncertainty in data constrained settings: A novel empirical approach tested on Ecuadorian Cocoa cultivations," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 985-999, November.
    7. Diana Martínez-Arteaga & Nolver Atanacio Arias Arias & Aquiles E. Darghan & Dursun Barrios, 2023. "Identification of Influential Factors in the Adoption of Irrigation Technologies through Neural Network Analysis: A Case Study with Oil Palm Growers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Han, Guang & Niles, Meredith T., 2023. "An adoption spectrum for sustainable agriculture practices: A new framework applied to cover crop adoption," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Jelili Adegboyega Adebiyi & Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Robert Richardson & Lenis Saweda O Liverpool-Tasie & Kathleen Delate, 2019. "Drivers and Constraints to the Adoption of Organic Leafy Vegetable Production in Nigeria: A Livelihood Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Yuchen Lu & Jiakun Zhuang & Jun Chen & Chenlu Yang & Mei Kong, 2025. "The Impact of Farmland Transfer on Urban–Rural Integration: Causal Inference Based on Double Machine Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, January.
    11. Marije Schaafsma & Ilda Dreoni & Lacour Mody Ayompe & Benis Egoh & Dewa Putu Ekayana & Arilson Favareto & Sonny Mumbunan & Louise Nakagawa & Jonas Ngouhouo‐poufoun & Marieke Sassen & Thiago Kanashiro , 2023. "A framework to understand the social impacts of agricultural trade," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 138-150, February.
    12. Beata Michaliszyn-Gabryś & Joachim Bronder & Janusz Krupanek, 2024. "Social Life Cycle Assessment of Laser Weed Control System: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.
    13. Hilario Becerril & Ignacio De los Rios, 2016. "Energy Efficiency Strategies for Ecological Greenhouses: Experiences from Murcia (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Ming Chang & Xiaotong Li & Fei Li & Hesen Zhao, 2024. "Impact of Farmers’ Livelihoods on Agricultural Carbon Emission Efficiency Under the Background of Population Urbanization: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Möhring, Niklas & Finger, Robert, 2022. "Pesticide-free but not organic: Adoption of a large-scale wheat production standard in Switzerland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. Yu, Lili & Zhao, Duanyang & Xue, Zihao & Gao, Yang, 2020. "Research on the use of digital finance and the adoption of green control techniques by family farms in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    17. Mingjun Tian & Yunhua Wu, 2024. "E-Commerce Participation, Subjective Norms and Grassland Utilization Pressure: An Empirical Evidence of Herdsmen in Inner Mongolia, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-31, April.
    18. Yinglong Xin & Yaoqun Xu & Yi Zheng, 2024. "A Study on Green Agricultural Production Decision-Making by Agricultural Cooperatives under Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.
    19. Meemken, Eva-Marie & Spielman, David J. & Qaim, Matin, 2017. "Trading off nutrition and education? A panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of Organic and Fairtrade standards," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 74-85.
    20. Camila Fritzen Cidón & Paola Schmitt Figueiró & Dusan Schreiber, 2021. "Benefits of Organic Agriculture under the Perspective of the Bioeconomy: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    21. Jezeer, Rosalien E. & Santos, Maria J. & Boot, René G.A. & Junginger, Martin & Verweij, Pita A., 2018. "Effects of shade and input management on economic performance of small-scale Peruvian coffee systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 179-190.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:763-:d:1570611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.