IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p479-d1563716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptation of Existent Methods for Setting Decarbonization Targets in the Brazilian Power Sector Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Hugo Barros Bozelli

    (Energy Planning Program, Institute for Postgraduate Studies and Research in Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (PPE/COPPE/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941909, Brazil)

  • Bruna Silveira Guimarães

    (Energy Planning Program, Institute for Postgraduate Studies and Research in Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (PPE/COPPE/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941909, Brazil)

  • Alex Azevedo dos Santos

    (Waycarbon Soluções Ambientais e Projetos de Carbono AS, Rio de Janeiro 30140080, Brazil)

  • Priscila Grutzmacher

    (Waycarbon Soluções Ambientais e Projetos de Carbono AS, Rio de Janeiro 30140080, Brazil)

  • Caroline Cristine Botta

    (Waycarbon Soluções Ambientais e Projetos de Carbono AS, Rio de Janeiro 30140080, Brazil)

  • José Eduardo Nunes da Rocha

    (Energy Planning Program, Institute for Postgraduate Studies and Research in Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (PPE/COPPE/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941909, Brazil)

  • Amaro Olimpio Pereira Jr.

    (Energy Planning Program, Institute for Postgraduate Studies and Research in Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (PPE/COPPE/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941909, Brazil)

Abstract

Power sector companies are crucial in global decarbonization, accounting for 32% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Despite frameworks like the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi), there is ongoing debate about the adequacy of current target-setting methods and emissions allocation. This paper focuses on Brazil’s diverse, renewable-heavy energy mix and complex regulatory environment. It highlights the challenges faced by vertically integrated and predominantly renewable energy companies in meeting SBTi goals, despite their commitment to climate action. The study finds that the current SBTi methodology fails to accurately reflect the efforts of these companies, often penalizing them for emissions beyond their control. An alternative methodology is proposed that excludes unmanageable emissions, aligning targets more closely with operational actions while maintaining transparency in reporting. A key finding is that this new methodology avoids distortions caused by external factors, ensuring emissions reductions are tied to company actions. For renewable power utilities, the methodology emphasizes high-emission categories within the value chain, such as asset construction and maintenance, promoting deeper engagement in decarbonization. A new tool and scenarios were developed, showing that proposed adjustments enhance target accuracy, support global emissions reduction goals, and provide a more transparent and equitable way for companies to report emissions, distinguishing between controllable and external factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Hugo Barros Bozelli & Bruna Silveira Guimarães & Alex Azevedo dos Santos & Priscila Grutzmacher & Caroline Cristine Botta & José Eduardo Nunes da Rocha & Amaro Olimpio Pereira Jr., 2025. "Adaptation of Existent Methods for Setting Decarbonization Targets in the Brazilian Power Sector Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:479-:d:1563716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/479/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/479/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maia, Rodrigo Gomes Távora & Garcia, Katia Cristina, 2023. "What they say, what they do and how they do it: An evaluation of the energy transition and GHG emissions of electricity companies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiang Wang & Xinhua Wang & Rongrong Li, 2024. "Geopolitical risks and energy transition: the impact of environmental regulation and green innovation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Anrafel de Souza Barbosa & Maria Cristina Crispim & Luiz Bueno da Silva & Jonhatan Magno Norte da Silva & Aglaucibelly Maciel Barbosa & Sandra Naomi Morioka, 2024. "How can organizations measure the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria? Validation of an instrument using item response theory to capture workers' perception," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3607-3634, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:479-:d:1563716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.