IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p384-d1561529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Economy, R&D Resource Allocation, and Convergence of Regional Green Economy Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Guodong Yi

    (School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China)

  • Juan Gao

    (School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China)

  • Wentao Yuan

    (School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China)

  • Yan Zeng

    (School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China)

  • Xiang Liu

    (School of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou 510521, China)

Abstract

We looked into the ways in which the digital economy helps to speed up the convergence of environmentally responsible economic efficiency across China’s regions by facilitating the flow and optimization of R&D resources. We measured the mobility of R&D capital and personnel across 30 provinces in China from 2001 to 2022 using a gravity model, assessed the efficiency of green economic using the SBM method, and determined the influence of the digital economy by the use of a fixed-effects model. (1) We identified the σ convergence (the absolute gap between per capita income or per capita economic efficiency levels of different economies gradually decreasing over time) and β convergence (the negative correlation between the rate of economic efficiency increase among various economies or regions and their initial level of economic efficiency) characteristics of green economic efficiency, discovering that the digital economy has sped up the process of convergence of environmentally responsible economic efficiency in regional areas. (2) We found a latecomer advantage in the convergence of China’s green economic efficiency, along with the advancement of the digital economy; that is, the green economic efficiency more quickly converged in less developed regions and regions with fewer resources. (3) The digital economy is able to accelerate the convergence of regional green economy efficiency through the use of internal mechanisms such as the efficient flow of research and development factors and the reasonable allocation of those factors. By identifying the impact of the digital economy on the gaps in regional green economic efficiency from the new perspective of the flow and allocation of R&D elements, this study contributes to the existing body of literature. It also provides new information regarding the ways in which the digital economy is driving the development of China’s green economy. We offer policy suggestions based on our findings to assist regions in achieving a balance between the digital economy and industrial development through the utilization of resources that are specific to the location.

Suggested Citation

  • Guodong Yi & Juan Gao & Wentao Yuan & Yan Zeng & Xiang Liu, 2025. "Digital Economy, R&D Resource Allocation, and Convergence of Regional Green Economy Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:384-:d:1561529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/384/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Dollar & Shang-Jin Wei, 2007. "Das (Wasted) Kapital: Firm Ownership and Investment Efficiency in China," NBER Working Papers 13103, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    3. Roback, Jennifer, 1982. "Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 90(6), pages 1257-1278, December.
    4. Yaya Su & Zhenghui Li & Cunyi Yang, 2021. "Spatial Interaction Spillover Effects between Digital Financial Technology and Urban Ecological Efficiency in China: An Empirical Study Based on Spatial Simultaneous Equations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Choi, Changkyu & Hoon Yi, Myung, 2009. "The effect of the Internet on economic growth: Evidence from cross-country panel data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 39-41, October.
    6. Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Xu, Lu & Wu, Haitao & Ba, Ning, 2021. "Digitalization and energy: How does internet development affect China's energy consumption?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Fengyu Zhao & Ziqing Xu & Xiaowen Xie, 2024. "Exploring the Role of Digital Economy in Enhanced Green Productivity in China’s Manufacturing Sector: Fresh Evidence for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    9. Li, Guoxiang & Wu, Haoyue & Jiang, Jieshu & Zong, Qingqing, 2023. "Digital finance and the low-carbon energy transition (LCET) from the perspective of capital-biased technical progress," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Partridge & M. Rose Olfert & Alessandro Alasia, 2007. "Canadian cities as regional engines of growth: agglomeration and amenities," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 39-68, February.
    2. Pablo D. Fajgelbaum & Edouard Schaal, 2020. "Optimal Transport Networks in Spatial Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1411-1452, July.
    3. Stephen J. Redding & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, 2017. "Quantitative Spatial Economics," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 21-58, September.
    4. Edward L. Glaeser, 1998. "Are Cities Dying?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 139-160, Spring.
    5. Jordan Rappaport & Jeffrey D. Sachs, 2001. "The U.S. as a coastal nation," Research Working Paper RWP 01-11, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    6. Becker, Sascha O. & Heblich, Stephan & Sturm, Daniel M., 2021. "The impact of public employment: Evidence from Bonn," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    7. Ottaviano, Gianmarco I.P. & Pinelli, Dino, 2006. "Market potential and productivity: Evidence from Finnish regions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 636-657, September.
    8. João Pereira & Aurora Galego, 2014. "Inter-Regional Wage Differentials in Portugal: An Analysis Across the Wage Distribution," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(9), pages 1529-1546, September.
    9. Michael Storper, 2010. "Agglomeration, Trade, And Spatial Development: Bringing Dynamics Back In," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 313-342, February.
    10. Theodore Papageorgiou, 2022. "Occupational Matching and Cities," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 82-132, July.
    11. Christoph Albert & Joan Monras, 2022. "Immigration and Spatial Equilibrium: The Role of Expenditures in the Country of Origin," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(11), pages 3763-3802, November.
    12. Vera A. Adamchik & Thomas J. Hyclak, 2013. "The Evolution Of Regional Wage Differentials In A Transition Economy: Evidence From Poland," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(5), pages 1-13.
    13. Bo Li & Jing Liu & Qian Liu & Muhammad Mohiuddin, 2022. "The Effects of Broadband Infrastructure on Carbon Emission Efficiency of Resource-Based Cities in China: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from the “Broadband China” Pilot Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-27, May.
    14. Pflüger, Michael & Tabuchi, Takatoshi, 2010. "The size of regions with land use for production," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 481-489, November.
    15. Gathmann, Christina & Helm, Ines & Schönberg, Uta, 2014. "Spillover Effects in Local Labor Markets: Evidence from Mass Layoffs," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100378, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. Takatoshi Tabuchi & Jacques-Francois Thisse, 2001. "Labor Mobility and Economic Geography," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-99, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    17. Falck, Oliver & Heblich, Stephan & Lameli, Alfred & Südekum, Jens, 2012. "Dialects, cultural identity, and economic exchange," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 225-239.
    18. Aurora Galego & João Pereira, 2014. "Decomposition of Regional Wage Differences Along the Wage Distribution in Portugal: The Importance of Covariates," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(10), pages 2514-2532, October.
    19. William C. Strange, 2009. "Viewpoint: Agglomeration research in the age of disaggregation," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 42(1), pages 1-27, February.
    20. Zhenhua Chen & Laurie A. Schintler, 2023. "Rediscovering regional science: Positioning the field's evolving location in science and society," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 617-642, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:384-:d:1561529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.