IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p157-d1555246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Digital Environmental Governance on Green Transformation: Theoretical Mechanism and Empirical Test from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoman Zhao

    (School of Economics & Management, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Shuai Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Fengzhi Lu

    (School of Big Data and Statistics, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

Abstract

In the era of digitalization, digital environmental governance has gradually emerged as a new driving force for promoting economic green transformation. Taking China’s 30 provinces as the research sample, on the basis of the theoretical analysis, this paper explores the influence, mechanism, and threshold effects of digital environmental governance on green transformation by using a panel fixed model, a two-step mechanism test model, and a threshold model, respectively. The spatial Durbin model is further employed to discuss the spatial spillover effects of the digital environmental governance’s influence. The results indicate that the following: (1) Digital environmental governance can effectively enhance green transformation, with a pronounced impact observed in central and western regions and high-pollution areas. (2) Mechanism analysis reveals that the intermediary pathway for achieving green transformation through digital environmental governance lies in strengthening environmental regulation intensity. Meanwhile, this enabling effect is constrained by the development level of regional digital economy, showing an “increasing marginal utility” characteristic along with the digital economy. (3) The digital environmental governance’s influence shows a spatial spillover effect, which not only enhances local green transformation but also significantly contributes to promoting surrounding green transformation. Therefore, it is necessary to expedite the integrated application of digital technology in the field of environmental governance, prioritize tailored enabling strategies based on local conditions, and reinforce the supportive role played by the digital economy through multiple avenues to effectively harness the benefits of this new opportunity presented by digital environmental governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoman Zhao & Shuai Zhang & Fengzhi Lu, 2024. "The Impact of Digital Environmental Governance on Green Transformation: Theoretical Mechanism and Empirical Test from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:157-:d:1555246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, Bruce E., 1999. "Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 345-368, December.
    2. Du, Kerui & Cheng, Yuanyuan & Yao, Xin, 2021. "Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    3. Ran, Qiying & Yang, Xiaodong & Yan, Hongchuan & Xu, Yang & Cao, Jianhong, 2023. "Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Xue, Yan & Chen, Li & Feng, Zhiying & Huang, Yunying, 2024. "Breaking the resource curse: Heterogeneous effects of digital government," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. David M. Konisky, 2007. "Regulatory Competition and Environmental Enforcement: Is There a Race to the Bottom?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(4), pages 853-872, October.
    6. Lu, Yuchen & Gao, Yuqiang & Zhang, Yu & Wang, Junrong, 2022. "Can the green finance policy force the green transformation of high-polluting enterprises? A quasi-natural experiment based on “Green Credit Guidelines”," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Arthur Lewbel, 1997. "Constructing Instruments for Regressions with Measurement Error when no Additional Data are Available, with an Application to Patents and R&D," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1201-1214, September.
    8. Angel Hsu & Zhi Yi Yeo & Amy Weinfurter, 2020. "Emerging digital environmental governance in China: the case of black and smelly waters in China," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(1), pages 14-31, January.
    9. Song, Malin & Du, Juntao & Tan, Kim Hua, 2018. "Impact of fiscal decentralization on green total factor productivity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 359-367.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ran, Qiying & Yang, Xiaodong & Yan, Hongchuan & Xu, Yang & Cao, Jianhong, 2023. "Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: Does the digital economy matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Li, Haichao & Su, Yuqi & Ding, Chante Jian & Tian, Gary Gang & Wu, Zhan, 2024. "Unveiling the green innovation paradox: Exploring the impact of carbon emission reduction on corporate green technology innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    3. Juan Tang & Fangming Qin, 2022. "Analyzing the impact of local government competition on green total factor productivity from the factor market distortion perspective: based on the three stage DEA model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14298-14326, December.
    4. Yanli Ji & Jie Xue & Kaiyang Zhong, 2022. "Does Environmental Regulation Promote Industrial Green Technology Progress? Empirical Evidence from China with a Heterogeneity Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Zhu, Junpeng & Lin, Boqiang, 2022. "Resource dependence, market-oriented reform, and industrial transformation: Empirical evidence from Chinese cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Sailian Xia & Daming You & Zhihua Tang & Bo Yang, 2021. "Analysis of the Spatial Effect of Fiscal Decentralization and Environmental Decentralization on Carbon Emissions under the Pressure of Officials’ Promotion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Dong, Hao & Zheng, Yingrong & Tang, Yuhong, 2024. "Impact of FinTech on the industrial structural transformation: Evidence from China's resource-based cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Jiekuan Zhang & Yan Zhang, 2023. "Examining the effects of economic growth pressure on green total factor productivity: evidence from China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4309-4337, December.
    9. Bai, Rui & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "Nexus between green finance development and green technological innovation: A potential way to achieve the renewable energy transition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    10. Ge, Shilong & Luo, Xiaodan & Li, Yuangang & Zheng, Lanxing, 2024. "The impact of green credit policy on total factor productivity of enterprises," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    11. Xiaoyu He & Bo Li, 2023. "A Study on the Influence of Green Industrial Policy on Urban Green Development: Based on the Empirical Data of Ecological Industrial Park Pilot Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    12. Yunyan Jiang & Feng Deng, 2022. "Multi-Dimensional Threshold Effects of the Digital Economy on Green Economic Growth?—New Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Yuxin Fang & Hongjun Cao & Jihui Sun, 2022. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Regional Green Development under China’s Environmental Decentralization System—Based on Spatial Durbin Model and Threshold Effect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-27, November.
    14. Xiaosan Zhang & Xiaojie Hu & Fang Wu, 2022. "Fiscal Decentralization, Taxation Efforts and Corporate Green Technology Innovation in China Based on Moderating and Heterogeneity Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    15. Song, Yang & Pang, Xiaoqian & Zhang, Zhiyuan & Sahut, Jean-Michel, 2024. "Can the new energy demonstration city policy promote corporate green innovation capability?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    16. Zhiyang Shen & Yunlong Zhang & Kaifa Wu & Muhammad Irfan & Yu Hao, 2024. "The Environmental Consequences of Local Government Competition: Evidence from 209 Chinese Cities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(6), pages 2115-2137, June.
    17. Peng Liang & Shuangyi Xie & Fengyu Qi & Yu Huang & Xiuwen Wu, 2023. "Environmental Regulation and Green Technology Innovation under the Carbon Neutrality Goal: Dual Regulation of Human Capital and Industrial Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Jinzhi Tong & Youyou Yang & Chunhua Zheng & Minglan Zheng, 2024. "Do Fiscal Incentives Contribute to Pollution Control? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Hao, Yu & Guo, Yunxia & Li, Suixin & Luo, Shiyue & Jiang, Xueting & Shen, Zhiyang & Wu, Haitao, 2022. "Towards achieving the sustainable development goal of industry: How does industrial agglomeration affect air pollution?," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    20. Jing Xu & Dong Chen & Rongrong Liu & Maoxian Zhou & Yunxiao Kong, 2021. "Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation, and Industrial Transformation: An Empirical Study Based on City Function in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:157-:d:1555246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.