IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p10-d1551475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Cardboard as a Construction Material for Sustainable Building Practices in Lima, Peru

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Ikemiyashiro Higa

    (Leicester School of Architecture, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK)

  • Ahmad Taki

    (Leicester School of Architecture, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK)

Abstract

This research work aimed to analyse the impact and potential of cardboard as a construction material, as well as cultural aspects and sustainable construction regulations, in the context of Lima, Peru. The study employed a mixed research methodological approach, including three case studies from Japan, the Netherlands, and the UK, online interviews, and surveys with British, Polish, and Peruvian architects. Additionally, a range of dynamic thermal simulations of an existing school building in the UK employing cardboard construction material were conducted to evaluate its impact on energy consumption. The survey revealed that there is a gap in information about the material applied to the architecture and construction environment, which is coupled with a general distrust and little credibility regarding its inclusion. However, cardboard is also seen as a complementary material in hybrid construction systems, with potential recycling enhancing environmental sustainability. The case studies showed cardboard structures can fulfil different functions with flexible designs that are adaptable to different contexts, simple, economical, accessible, recyclable, and capable of resisting natural disasters. However, post-construction consequences affect the structural integrity. Simulations carried out with EnergyPlus confirmed that cardboard has an optimal performance that can be a great complement or variation to traditional materials to reduce the carbon footprint and could meet the U-value requirements established in the construction regulations. Since it has low thermal conductivity and good acoustic insulation, it is recyclable and generates fewer CO 2 emissions, and it is economical, accessible, versatile, and light in use. For example, from a technical point of view, when used as thermal insulation, this element outperforms other conventional materials due to its cellular structure, which traps air, a poor conductor of heat. This study provides a set of guidelines for sustainable building practices. Such guidelines can be adopted to produce a prototype of a sustainable building using cardboard as the main construction material to contribute to the current debates on the state of building materials. It offers valuable perspectives on the development of building materials, construction techniques, and building regulations that can guide the way forward for sustainable building practices in the future, informing policymakers and building designers about construction techniques that adhere to building codes and lessen the built environment’s environmental impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Ikemiyashiro Higa & Ahmad Taki, 2024. "Examining Cardboard as a Construction Material for Sustainable Building Practices in Lima, Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-36, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:10-:d:1551475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/10/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/10/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo Fitas & Heinz Joachim Schaffrath & Samuel Schabel, 2023. "A Review of Optimization for Corrugated Boards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-27, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:10-:d:1551475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.