IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3251-d1375050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Forces of Ecological Environment Quality in the Qinling Mountains, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiachen Liu

    (College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China)

  • Tao Xie

    (School of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
    Shaanxi Satellite Application Center for Natural Resources, Xi’an 710002, China)

  • Du Lyu

    (Shaanxi Satellite Application Center for Natural Resources, Xi’an 710002, China
    Ecological Civilization and A Beautiful China Assessment and Research Center, Xi’an 710002, China)

  • Lu Cui

    (Shaanxi Satellite Application Center for Natural Resources, Xi’an 710002, China
    Ecological Civilization and A Beautiful China Assessment and Research Center, Xi’an 710002, China)

  • Qiuman Liu

    (Shaanxi Satellite Application Center for Natural Resources, Xi’an 710002, China
    Ecological Civilization and A Beautiful China Assessment and Research Center, Xi’an 710002, China)

Abstract

The Qinling Mountains serve as a vital ecological barrier for China, needing regular monitoring for sustainable progress. The present study analyzed the Qinling Mountains (sections in Shaanxi province) via the Google Earth Engine (GEE) and Landsat images, constructing a Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) for quantitatively analyzing the spatiotemporal evolution of the ecological environment quality from 1990 to 2020. Additionally, this study integrated geodetector and multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) to discern the driving factors influencing ecological quality. The results indicated the following: (1) over the 30 years, the RSEI in the study area initially declined (1990–2005) and then began to improve (2005–2020), demonstrating an overall upward trend; (2) RSEI varied with topography: lower values corresponded to lower elevations (<1200 m) and gentle slopes (<10°), whereas higher values were linked to higher elevations (>1600 m) and steeper slopes (>20°); and (3) NDVI, DEM, land use, and the presence of protected areas emerged as the main driving forces of ecological quality. The interaction between ecological conservation policies and socioeconomic factors enhanced the explanatory strength for the differentiation in ecological environment quality. In conclusion, factors like increased vegetation cover and the establishment of protected areas have significantly promoted the improvement of ecological environment quality in the Qinling region, making this study a scientific reference for providing ecological environment protection and promoting high-quality development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiachen Liu & Tao Xie & Du Lyu & Lu Cui & Qiuman Liu, 2024. "Analyzing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Forces of Ecological Environment Quality in the Qinling Mountains, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3251-:d:1375050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3251/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3251/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianbo Zhou & Wanqing Liu, 2022. "Monitoring and Evaluation of Eco-Environment Quality Based on Remote Sensing-Based Ecological Index (RSEI) in Taihu Lake Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yiwen Wang & Jiangang Xu & Di Liu & Yuye Zhou, 2023. "Analysis and Comparison of the Industrial Economic Resilience in the Taihu Lake Basin under the 2008 Financial Crisis and the 2018 Sino-US Trade War," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Shuang Zhang & Shaobo Liu & Qikang Zhong & Kai Zhu & Hongpeng Fu, 2024. "Assessing Eco-Environmental Effects and Its Impacts Mechanisms in the Mountainous City: Insights from Ecological–Production–Living Spaces Using Machine Learning Models in Chongqing," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Xin Dai & Jianping Chen & Chenli Xue, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and Driving Factors of the Ecological Environmental Quality along the Jakarta–Bandung High-Speed Railway in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Shuzhen Mao & Jiyun She & Yi Zhang, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Land Use Change and Eco-Environmental Effects in the Chang-Zhu-Tan Core Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Haobei Liu & Qi Wang & Na Liu & Hengrui Zhang & Yifei Tan & Zhe Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Land Use/Cover Change on Ecological Environment Quality and Its Spatial Spillover Effect under the Coupling Effect of Urban Expansion and Open-Pit Mining Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Xun Zhang & Zhaoliang Gao & Yonghong Li & Guanfan Sun & Yunfeng Cen & Yongcai Lou & Yihang Yao & Wenbo Liu, 2023. "Eco-Environment Quality Response to Climate Change and Human Activities on the Loess Plateau, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Yongbin Zhang & Tanglei Song & Jihao Fan & Weidong Man & Mingyue Liu & Yongqiang Zhao & Hao Zheng & Yahui Liu & Chunyu Li & Jingru Song & Xiaowu Yang & Junmin Du, 2022. "Land Use and Climate Change Altered the Ecological Quality in the Luanhe River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Katerina Vatitsi & Nena Ioannidou & Anastasia Mirli & Sofia Siachalou & Ifigenia Kagalou & Dionissis Latinopoulos & Giorgos Mallinis, 2023. "LULC Change Effects on Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Services Using EO Data in Two Rural River Basins in Thrace, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3251-:d:1375050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.