IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3250-d1375037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Location-Oriented Policies in China: Establishment of State-Level Development Zones and Enterprise Innovation Behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Zhao

    (School of Economics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Wanshu Wu

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Shengxiang Xu

    (School of Statistics, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China)

  • Jialin Liu

    (School of Economics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Weidong Sun

    (School of Economics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

Abstract

The impact of state-level development zones on company innovation behaviors—specifically, innovation input, output, and quality—is examined in this research. This study utilizes the establishment of state-level development zones as a quasi-natural experiment and employs a Staggered Difference-In-Difference model to systematically evaluate the actual effects. Furthermore, this research focuses on the heterogeneous effects of state-level development zones on enterprise innovation, taking into account different functional positionings, such as the Economic and Technological Development Zone (ETDZ), the High-Tech Industrial Development Zone (HIDZ), and the Special Customs Supervision Zone (SCSZ). The results of previous research indicate that the establishment of state-level development zones may effectively foster company innovation and have a noteworthy effect on the input, output, and quality of innovation. The establishment of ETDZs and HIDZs can significantly encourage enterprises to increase their investment in innovation. The innovation incentive effect of HIDZs is stronger than that of ETDZs. On the other hand, the establishment of SCSZs is more beneficial for improving the output and quality of innovation in enterprises. ETDZs can promote innovation output by adjusting industry agglomeration in the region. HIDZs can encourage enterprises to increase their innovation input by intensifying tax preferences and reducing the level of industry agglomeration. SCSZs can effectively promote the innovation input, innovation output, and innovation quality of enterprises by increasing government subsidies and the intensity of tax preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Zhao & Wanshu Wu & Shengxiang Xu & Jialin Liu & Weidong Sun, 2024. "Location-Oriented Policies in China: Establishment of State-Level Development Zones and Enterprise Innovation Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3250-:d:1375037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3250/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3250/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu Guo & WeiYa Long & Zhimin Dai, 2021. "Manufacturing R&D investment efficiency and financing constraints: evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(6), pages 676-687, February.
    2. Thierry Mayer & Florian Mayneris & Loriane Py, 2017. "The impact of Urban Enterprise Zones on establishment location decisions and labor market outcomes: evidence from France," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 709-752.
    3. Annette Schminke & Johannes Van Biesebroeck, 2013. "Using export market performance to evaluate regional preferential policies in China," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 149(2), pages 343-367, June.
    4. Kurita, Kenichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2023. "New economic geography model with natural capital and migration congestion effect," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 635-641.
    5. Xi, Qiangmin & Sun, Ruidong & Mei, Lin, 2021. "The impact of special economic zones on producer services productivity: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/125h4fg7e89gi95ui3ml6ggod9 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Ángela Vásquez-Urriago & Andrés Barge-Gil & Aurelia Rico & Evita Paraskevopoulou, 2014. "The impact of science and technology parks on firms’ product innovation: empirical evidence from Spain," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 835-873, September.
    8. Yishao Shi & Bo Zheng & Zhu Wang & Jianwen Zheng, 2023. "Mixed Land Use and Its Relationship with CO 2 Emissions: A Comparative Analysis Based on Several Typical Development Zones in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Yang Yao & Muyang Zhang, 2015. "Subnational leaders and economic growth: evidence from Chinese cities," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 405-436, December.
    10. Marisa Ramírez-Alesón & Marta Fernández-Olmos, 2018. "Unravelling the effects of Science Parks on the innovation performance of NTBFs," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 482-505, April.
    11. Jie (Jeanne) Huang, 2021. "The Latest Generation of SEZs: Consumer-Oriented Unilateralism in China’s E-Commerce Trade," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 299-320.
    12. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/3l4arseauo82kr3cm0qr8uihmg is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Julien Chaisse & Georgios Dimitropoulos, 2021. "Special Economic Zones in International Economic Law: Towards Unilateral Economic Law," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 229-257.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Albahari & Andrés Barge-Gil & Salvador Pérez-Canto & Paolo Landoni, 2023. "The effect of science and technology parks on tenant firms: a literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1489-1531, August.
    2. Binkai Chen & Ming Lu & Christopher Timmins & Kuanhu Xiang, 2019. "Spatial Misallocation: Evaluating Place-Based Policies Using a Natural Experiment in China," NBER Working Papers 26148, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Chen, Wei & Su, Zhi & Wang, Yanan & Wang, Qian & Zhao, Guoli, 2022. "Do the rank difference of industrial development zones affect land use efficiency? A regional analysis in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Qiangmin, XI & Peng, JI, 2023. "Does the development zone promote population urbanization? Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Yekun Xu & Guangyuan Ma & Lijuan Cui, 2023. "Officials' Foreign Experience and Firms' Exports: Evidence from China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(3), pages 173-204, May.
    6. Wang, He & Yao, Yang & Zhou, Yue, 2022. "Markets price politicians: Evidence from China’s municipal bond markets," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    7. Fan, Jianyong & Liu, Yu & Zhang, Qi & Zhao, Peng, 2022. "Does government debt impede firm innovation? Evidence from the rise of LGFVs in China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Beck, Mathias & Junge, Martin & Kaiser, Ulrich, 2017. "Public Funding and Corporate Innovation," IZA Discussion Papers 11196, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Alberto Albahari & Magnus Klofsten & Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero, 2019. "Science and Technology Parks: a study of value creation for park tenants," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1256-1272, August.
    10. Paul Pelzl & Steven Poelhekke, 2023. "Democratization, leader education and growth: firm-level evidence from Indonesia," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 571-600, December.
    11. Federico Belotti & Edoardo Di Porto & Gianluca Santoni, 2021. "The effect of local taxes on firm performance: Evidence from geo‐referenced data," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 492-510, March.
    12. Thomas F. Remington & Andrei A. Yakovlev & Elena Ovchinnikova & Alexander Chasovsky, 2020. "Career Trajectories Of Regional Officials: Russia And China Before And After 2012," HSE Working papers WP BRP 754/PS/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    13. Gibbons, Stephen & Overman, Henry & Sarvimäki, Matti, 2021. "The local economic impacts of regeneration projects: Evidence from UK's single regeneration budget," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Ren Wang & Yuxiang Bian & Han Gao & Jie Hou, 2023. "Optimal Environmental Policy for Heterogeneous Governments in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-12, February.
    15. Manon Garrouste & Miren Lafourcade, 2022. "Place-Based Policies: Opportunity for Deprived Schools or Zone-and-Shame Effect?," Post-Print hal-04329793, HAL.
    16. Xin Nie & Jianxian Wu & Han Wang & Weijuan Li & Chengdao Huang & Lihua Li, 2022. "Contributing to carbon peak: Estimating the causal impact of eco‐industrial parks on low‐carbon development in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1578-1593, August.
    17. Bruce, Raphael & Cavgias, Alexsandros & Meloni, Luis & Remígio, Mário, 2022. "Under pressure: Women’s leadership during the COVID-19 crisis," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    18. Laura Lecluyse & Mirjam Knockaert & André Spithoven, 2019. "The contribution of science parks: a literature review and future research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 559-595, April.
    19. Jingyi Tian & Jun Nagayasu, 2023. "Financial Systemic Risk behind Artificial Intelligence:Evidence from China," TUPD Discussion Papers 44, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    20. Chen, Zhao & Poncet, Sandra & Xiong, Ruixiang, 2017. "Inter-industry relatedness and industrial-policy efficiency: Evidence from China’s export processing zones," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 809-826.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3250-:d:1375037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.