IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3224-d1374423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Evaluation of the High-Quality Development of the Modern Service Industry under the Background of Reduction Development: A Case Study of Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Chuansheng Wang

    (School of Management and Engineering, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China)

  • Hang Yu

    (School of Management and Engineering, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China)

Abstract

With the popularization and practice of the concept of reduction development, how to accurately and comprehensively evaluate the high-quality development effect of the modern service industry has become crucial. This paper combines the concept of reduction development and high-quality development. According to the specific background of reduction development, this paper constructs the evaluation index system of high-quality development of the modern service industry in the context of reduction development from the four dimensions of total scale control, urban function strengthening, economic quality improvement and livable environment optimization and puts forward the evaluation model of high-quality development of the modern service industry based on the entropy weight TOPSIS method. Taking Beijing’s modern service industry as an example, our empirical analysis showed that from 2008 to 2021, its high-quality development level showed a steady upward trend. The total scale has been effectively controlled, and the service industry has performed well in employment absorption. Scientific and technological innovation and cultural functions have developed significantly, but the level of openness needs to be improved. Economic quality maintained stable development, and the livable environment also showed a good development trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuansheng Wang & Hang Yu, 2024. "Research on the Evaluation of the High-Quality Development of the Modern Service Industry under the Background of Reduction Development: A Case Study of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3224-:d:1374423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yun-Yun Ko & Yin-Hao Chiu, 2020. "Empirical Study of Urban Development Evaluation Indicators Based on the Urban Metabolism Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Xiaoyan Li & Yaxin Tan & Kang Tian, 2022. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation, Industrial Structure, and Interaction on the High-Quality Development Efficiency of the Yellow River Basin in China from the Perspective of the Threshold Effect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfonso Valero, 2024. "Diversification strategies for indirect real estate. Intersection of business, economics, and society in shanghai mixed-use developments," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(10), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Minghua Chen & Qian Li & Bianxiu Zhang & Linxiao Xie & Jianxu Liu & You Geng & Zhirui Liu, 2023. "The Spatial Correlation Network of China’s High-Quality Development and Its Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Zhongwu Zhang & Jinyuan Zhang & Liping Liu & Jian Gong & Jinqiang Li & Lei Kang, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Heterogeneity of Urbanization and Ecosystem Services in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Xueli Zhong & Yongfeng Li, 2023. "Mediating Effect and Suppressing Effect: Intermediate Mechanism of Urban Land Use Efficiency and Economic Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3224-:d:1374423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.