IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3149-d1372963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Flexible Plastic Packaging under a Sustainable Circular Economy Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Börçe Tunçok-Çeşme

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Marmara University, İstanbul 34854, Türkiye)

  • Eren Yıldız-Geyhan

    (Maltepe Municipality, İstanbul 34843, Türkiye)

  • Gökçen Alev Çiftçioğlu

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Marmara University, İstanbul 34854, Türkiye)

Abstract

While it is of great importance to evaluate plastic waste within the framework of a circular economy today, it is also of great importance to evaluate flexible plastic packaging, which is increasingly used in order to prevent environmental problems. To avoid the disadvantages experienced in recycling due to its multilayer nature, in this study, a life cycle assessment was made for flexible packages consisting of PET/metallized PET/PE and PP/metallized PP/PP with the data provided by the R&D Center of Elif Plastik Ambalaj Sanayi ve Tic. A.Ş.-Huhtamaki Flexibles Istanbul. Within the scope of this evaluation, two types of flexible packaging were analyzed, and an optimal flexible packaging structure for Türkiye was revealed by comparing different scenarios based on different methods in SimaPro 8.1.1.16. LCA was performed for both packages with cumulative energy demand (CED) and CML-IA methods. Four scenarios with different amounts of recycled raw materials were compared against the existing system and a fifth scenario, where electricity is assumed to be obtained from solar energy. Overall, we found that the largest environmental impact was in the existing system. However, despite being a renewable energy source, we observed that the solar energy scenario had almost as significant an impact as the existing system. When scenarios involving recycled raw materials were examined, we clearly observed that as the amount of recycled raw materials increased, the environmental impact decreased. Therefore, it emerged that the scenario with the highest amount of recycled raw materials is the most optimal scenario in many respects. There are clear differences in the results due to differences in plastic types. This study, conducted with real data, is highly important for the flexible packaging literature. A table has been provided for changing the type of plastic, changing the source of electricity generation, and reducing waste by using recycled raw materials in order to make flexible packaging more environmentally beneficial.

Suggested Citation

  • Börçe Tunçok-Çeşme & Eren Yıldız-Geyhan & Gökçen Alev Çiftçioğlu, 2024. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Flexible Plastic Packaging under a Sustainable Circular Economy Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3149-:d:1372963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Schmidt & David Laner, 2023. "The environmental performance of plastic packaging waste management in Germany: Current and future key factors," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1447-1460, December.
    2. Ólafur Ögmundarson & Laura Sophie Kalweit & Venkateshwaran Venkatachalam & Rakel Kristjánsdóttir & Hans-Josef Endres & Sebastian Spierling, 2022. "Plastic Packaging Waste Management in Iceland: Challenges and Opportunities from a Life Cycle Assessment Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3149-:d:1372963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.