IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p3027-d1370405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Pilot Study into the Use of Qualitative Methods to Improve the Awareness of Barriers to Sustainable Medical Waste Segregation within the United Kingdom’s National Health Service

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Webb

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK)

  • Lorna Anguilano

    (Experimental Techniques Centre, College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK)

  • Ximena Schmidt Rivera

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK)

Abstract

Within the United Kingdom, most medical waste is incorrectly classified as hazardous and disposed of via incineration or alternative treatment. Currently, no research has been conducted on why such a large quantity of medical waste is erroneously segregated. This pilot study explores the barriers to correct segregation with the aim to decrease the volume of incinerated waste by investigating why medical waste is wrongly identified as hazardous. No previous data are available to compare results, and so this study demonstrates the significance of using qualitative methods (questionnaires and focus groups) to bring awareness to issues faced within medical facilities when segregating waste. The low availability of different bins as well as lack of space and the healthcare workers’ busy schedules were identified as main reasons for poor segregation. Bins were sparsely placed, and staff lacked time to find the appropriate one leading to incorrect segregation of non-hazardous waste. Lack of information around whether a material was recyclable or not led to less recycled waste. When ways to engage with this issue were discussed, most medical staff favoured quick forms of information provision, such as posters, whereas a participant proclaimed longer hands-on style sessions as more effective. The findings of this study provide evidence that governmental strategies focused on sustainable medical waste management should direct their attention to the placement and availability of bins, whilst including ‘on-the-ground’ personnel in their decision making. This pilot study showed the value in using qualitative methods when current data are lacking and can be repeated by other healthcare facilities to collectively grow a greater awareness of the sustainability issues faced by the UK healthcare waste management system.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Webb & Lorna Anguilano & Ximena Schmidt Rivera, 2024. "A Pilot Study into the Use of Qualitative Methods to Improve the Awareness of Barriers to Sustainable Medical Waste Segregation within the United Kingdom’s National Health Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:3027-:d:1370405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/3027/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/3027/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosales, Claudia R. & Magazine, Michael & Rao, Uday, 2015. "The 2Bin system for controlling medical supplies at point-of-use," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 271-280.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanet, J.J. & Wells, C.E., 2019. "Setting bin quantities for 2-Bin Kanban systems (version 3)," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 142-149.
    2. Ying Yang & Huijing Wu & Caixia Yan, 2021. "Medical consumable usage control based on Canopy_K-means clustering and WARM," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 722-739, November.
    3. Esha Saha & Pradip Kumar Ray, 2019. "Modelling and analysis of healthcare inventory management systems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(4), pages 1179-1198, December.
    4. Duangpun Kritchanchai & Daranee Senarak & Tuangyot Supeekit & Wirachchaya Chanpuypetch, 2024. "Evaluating Supply Chain Network Models for Third Party Logistics Operated Supply-Processing-Distribution in Thai Hospitals: An AHP-Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, November.
    5. Ying Yang & Huijing Wu & Caixia Yan, 0. "Medical consumable usage control based on Canopy_K-means clustering and WARM," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    6. Moons, Karen & Waeyenbergh, Geert & Pintelon, Liliane, 2019. "Measuring the logistics performance of internal hospital supply chains – A literature study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 205-217.
    7. Volland, Jonas & Fügener, Andreas & Schoenfelder, Jan & Brunner, Jens O., 2017. "Material logistics in hospitals: A literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 82-101.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:3027-:d:1370405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.