IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2964-d1369143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Low-Carbon City Pilot Policies on Green Construction Industry Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Ma

    (College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Linjuan Zhu

    (College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

The building industry, as one of the fundamental and pivotal sectors of economic development in China, is also a high source of pollution emissions. Therefore, construction enterprises play a pivotal role in urban low-carbon development, and green innovation is an effective approach for these corporations to meet emission reduction targets and enhance economic benefits. This study primarily focused on the panel data of Chinese construction companies from 2000 to 2019. This study applied a multi-period double difference model. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of piloting low-carbon city policies on green innovations in the construction sector. The results indicate that the policy clearly advanced the green development of enterprises in the construction industry, and this effect persisted even after undergoing long-term robustness tests. The heterogeneity test results revealed that the pilot policy has been more effective in promoting green innovation for SOEs as well as for construction companies that are in the process of maturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Ma & Linjuan Zhu, 2024. "Impact of Low-Carbon City Pilot Policies on Green Construction Industry Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2964-:d:1369143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2964/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2964/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dante I. Leyva-de la Hiz & Vera Ferron-Vilchez & J. Alberto Aragon-Correa, 2019. "Do Firms’ Slack Resources Influence the Relationship Between Focused Environmental Innovations and Financial Performance? More is Not Always Better," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1215-1227, November.
    2. Daquan Gao & Christina W. Y. Wong & Kee-hung Lai, 2023. "Development of Ecosystem for Corporate Green Innovation: Resource Dependency Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    3. Yanbo Zhang & Xiang Li, 2022. "The Impact of the Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone on the Green Innovation—Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Jing Tang & Shilong Li, 2022. "How Do Environmental Regulation and Environmental Decentralization Affect Regional Green Innovation? Empirical Research from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Chen, Fu & Zhang, Wanyue & Chen, Run & Jiang, Feifei & Ma, Jing & Zhu, Xinhua, 2024. "Adapting carbon neutrality: Tailoring advanced emission strategies for developing countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    6. Peng Liang & Shuangyi Xie & Fengyu Qi & Yu Huang & Xiuwen Wu, 2023. "Environmental Regulation and Green Technology Innovation under the Carbon Neutrality Goal: Dual Regulation of Human Capital and Industrial Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Lou, Runchi & Wang, Keying, 2023. "How does green finance drive the decarbonization of the economy? Empirical evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 671-684.
    2. Amit Kundu & Dev Narayan Sarkar & Arabinda Bhattacharya, 2021. "The effect of uncertainty on the formulation of strategies: a study of selected Indian organizations," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Haiying Shao & Bowen Li & Yanjun Jiang, 2023. "Effect and Mechanism of Environmental Decentralization on Pollution Emission from Pig Farming—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Xiao Han & Yining Chen & Hehua Zhao, 2023. "Temporal–Spatial Evolution, Influencing Factors, and Driving Mechanisms of Environmental Regulation Performance Disparities: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Yifan Chen & Zhuo Jiang, 2024. "The Impact of Enterprise Technological Innovation on Environmental Performance—An Industry Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Yang, Yang & Jiang, Yan, 2023. "Does suppliers’ slack influence the relationship between buyers’ environmental orientation and green innovation?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Yonglei Zhang & Huanchen Tang & Donghai Yan, 2024. "The Impact of Carbon Emission Trading Policy on Industrial Structure Adjustment: A Perspective of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Chang, Yu-Fang, 2023. "Does green finance promote renewable energy? Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Zhao Dong & Haodong Xu & Zhifeng Zhang & Yipin Lyu & Yuqi Lu & Hongyan Duan, 2022. "Whether Green Finance Improves Green Innovation of Listed Companies—Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Mingxia Liu & Liqian Liu & Amei Feng, 2024. "The Impact of Green Innovation on Corporate Performance: An Analysis Based on Substantive and Strategic Green Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Samira Ben Belgacem & Ghousia Khatoon & Abad Alzuman, 2023. "Role of Renewable Energy and Financial Innovation in Environmental Protection: Empirical Evidence from UAE and Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-11, May.
    12. Xu, Aiting & Zhu, Yuhan & Wang, Wenpu, 2023. "Micro green technology innovation effects of green finance pilot policy—From the perspectives of action points and green value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Yang Shen & Xiaoyang Guo & Xiuwu Zhang, 2023. "Digital Financial Inclusion, Land Transfer, and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.
    14. Han, Liyan & Xie, Chen & Jin, Jiayu & Zhao, Yang, 2023. "Effect of low-carbon innovation on carbon risk: International firm-level investigation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Liu, Liqian & Feng, Amei & Liu, Mingxia, 2024. "The effect of green innovation on corporate financial performance: Does quality matter?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    16. Sini Laari & Tomi Solakivi & Anu Bask & Juuso Töyli & Lauri Ojala, 2021. "Unravelling Mickey Mouse: The Effect of Supply Chain Position and Organisational Slack on the Uneven Balance of Sustainability Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Boumediene Ramdani & Cherif Guermat & Kamel Mellahi, 2021. "The effect of downsizing on innovation outputs: The role of resource slack and constraints," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 46(2), pages 346-365, May.
    18. Miao He & Junli Huang & Ruyi Sun, 2023. "Forecast of Advanced Human Capital Gap Based on PSO-BP Neural Network and Coordination Pathway: Example of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Teirlinck, Peter, 2020. "Engaging in new and more research-oriented R&D projects: Interplay between level of new slack, business strategy and slack absorption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 181-194.
    20. Jiahao Gu & Liyuan Zheng & Changgao Cheng & Mengjiao Wang, 2023. "The Configuration Effect of Institutional Environment, Organizational Slack Resources, and Managerial Perceptions on the Corporate Water Responsibility of Small- and Medium-Sized Corporations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2964-:d:1369143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.