IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2857-d1366404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tradition and Innovation in the Italian Wine Industry: The Best Practices of Casa Paladin

Author

Listed:
  • Daniele Grechi

    (Dipartimento di Diritto, Economia e Culture, University of Insubria, Via. S. Abbondio, 12, 22100 Como, Italy)

  • Enrica Pavione

    (Dipartimento di Economia, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy)

  • Patrizia Gazzola

    (Dipartimento di Economia, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy)

  • Francesca Cardini

    (Dipartimento di Economia, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy)

Abstract

This study aims to make a significant contribution to the development of a model for integrating research in the wine sector, innovative knowledge, and family businesses with the traditional mode of production in the context of the introduction of modern production technologies with a view to sustainability and the improvement of services in tourism. From a methodological point of view, the research is based on the case study and, in particular, on Casa Paladin, a family business in the Italian wine sector, which bases its strategy on innovation in production processes and customer relations to obtain high product quality with the aim of meeting consumer needs. The findings underscore the crucial role of family businesses in preserving cultural and traditional elements in the wine sector, with technology and innovation serving as vital drivers for their development. Casa Paladin’s commitment to innovation in production processes and products is evident, emphasizing sustainability as a core element that impacts customer relationships and product quality. Enotourism, including tastings, festivals, and fairs, emerges as a significant aspect contributing to the promotion of the company’s history, culture, and traditions. This study posits Casa Paladin as a notable example in the Italian wine industry, offering transferable insights for other businesses. Its successful integration of culture, innovation, and sustainability contributes to a broader understanding of the contemporary role of family businesses in the Italian wine sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniele Grechi & Enrica Pavione & Patrizia Gazzola & Francesca Cardini, 2024. "Tradition and Innovation in the Italian Wine Industry: The Best Practices of Casa Paladin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2857-:d:1366404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2857/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2857/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriella Arcese & Serena Flammini & Maria Caludia Lucchetti & Olimpia Martucci, 2015. "Evidence and Experience of Open Sustainability Innovation Practices in the Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-24, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vivek Pandey & Natalia Vidal & Rajat Panwar & Lubna Nafees, 2019. "Characterization of Sustainability Leaders and Laggards in the Global Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Luciana Cingolani & Tim Hildebrandt, 2022. "Incentive Structures for the Adoption of Crowdsourcing in Public Policy: A Bureaucratic Politics Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Jakob Pohlisch, 2020. "Internal Open Innovation—Lessons Learned from Internal Crowdsourcing at SAP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Shuanping Dai & Guanzhong Yang, 2020. "Does Social Inducement Lead to Higher Open Innovation Investment? An Experimental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Jose Alejandro Cano & Abraham Londoño-Pineda & Maria Fanny Castro & Hugo Bécquer Paz & Carolina Rodas & Tatiana Arias, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review on E-Marketplaces, Open Innovation, and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-42, May.
    6. Lihuan Guo & Dongqiang Guo & Wei Wang & Hongwei Wang & Yenchun Jim Wu, 2018. "Distance Diffusion of Home Bias for Crowdfunding Campaigns between Categories: Insights from Data Analytics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Grazia Chiara Elmo & Gabriella Arcese & Marco Valeri & Stefano Poponi & Francesco Pacchera, 2020. "Sustainability in Tourism as an Innovation Driver: An Analysis of Family Business Reality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Antonio Marín-García & Irene Gil-Saura & María Eugenia Ruiz-Molina & Gloria Berenguer-Contrí, 2021. "Sustainability, Store Equity, and Satisfaction: The Moderating Effect of Gender in Retailing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Amalya L. Oliver & Rotem Rittblat, 2023. "Facilitating Innovation for Complex Societal Challenges: Creating Communities and Innovation Ecosystems for SDG Goal of Forming Partnerships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Stella Lippolis & Angelo Ruggieri & Rossella Leopizzi, 2023. "Open Innovation for sustainable transition: The case of Enel “Open Power”," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4202-4216, November.
    11. Anja Gaudig & Bernd Ebersberger & Andreas Kuckertz, 2021. "Sustainability-Oriented Macro Trends and Innovation Types—Exploring Different Organization Types Tackling the Global Sustainability Megatrend," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Simms, Christopher & Frishammar, Johan, 2024. "Technology transfer challenges in asymmetric alliances between high-technology and low-technology firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    13. Eleni N. Arvaniti & Agapi Dima & Chrysostomos D. Stylios & Vagelis G. Papadakis, 2022. "A New Step-by-Step Model for Implementing Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Heather Markham Kim & In-Hye Lee & Kyuhyeon Joo & JungHoon (Jay) Lee & Jinsoo Hwang, 2022. "Psychological Benefits of Purchasing Home Meal Replacement in the Context of Eco-Friendly TV Home Shopping Broadcast: The Moderating Role of Personal Norm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Stefania Testa & Paolo Roma & Maria Vasi & Silvano Cincotti, 2020. "Crowdfunding as a tool to support sustainability‐oriented initiatives: Preliminary insights into the role of product/service attributes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 530-546, February.
    16. Mohammad Alawamleh & Mohammed Al-Hussaini & Loiy Bani Ismail, 2022. "Open innovation in the food industry: trends and barriers — a case of the Jordanian food industry," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 279-290, December.
    17. Pocol, Cristina Bianca & Moldovan Teselios, Călin & Stan, Laura & Pop, Ioana Delia, 2016. "Alfalfa Powder: Healthy Food Supplement for Sustainable Consumption," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 16(31), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Troise, Ciro & Tani, Mario & Dinsmore, John & Schiuma, Giovanni, 2021. "Understanding the implications of equity crowdfunding on sustainability-oriented innovation and changes in agri-food systems: Insights into an open innovation approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Kimpimäki, Jaan-Pauli & Malacina, Iryna & Lähdeaho, Oskari, 2022. "Open and sustainable: An emerging frontier in innovation management?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Francesca Michelino & Antonello Cammarano & Andrea Celone & Mauro Caputo, 2019. "The Linkage between Sustainability and Innovation Performance in IT Hardware Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2857-:d:1366404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.