IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1494-d1336712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Subjective and Objective Road Environment Perception in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region, Thailand: A Deep Learning Approach Utilizing Street Images

Author

Listed:
  • Pawinee Iamtrakul

    (Center of Excellence in Urban Mobility Research and Innovation, Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Thammasat University, Bangkok 12120, Thailand)

  • Sararad Chayphong

    (Center of Excellence in Urban Mobility Research and Innovation, Faculty of Architecture and Planning, Thammasat University, Bangkok 12120, Thailand)

  • Pittipol Kantavat

    (Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)

  • Kazuki Nakamura

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Meijo University, Nagoya 468-8502, Japan)

  • Yoshitsugu Hayashi

    (Center for Sustainable Development and Global Smart City, Chubu University, Kasugai 487-8501, Japan)

  • Boonserm Kijsirikul

    (Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)

  • Yuji Iwahori

    (Department of Computer Science, Chubu University, Kasugai 487-8501, Japan)

Abstract

Recently, deep learning techniques, specifically semantic segmentation, have been employed to extract visual features from street images, a dimension that has received limited attention in the investigation of the connection between subjective and objective road environment perception. This study is dedicated to exploring and comprehending the factors influencing commuters’ perceptions of the road environment, with the aim of bridging the gap in interpreting environmental quality in Thailand. Semantic segmentation was applied to identify visual objects, expressed as a percentage of pixels represented in 14,812 street images from the Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Subjective road environment perception was assessed through a questionnaire, with a total of 3600 samples collected. Both sets of data were converted to average values per grid, with a grid size of 500 × 500 square meters, resulting in a total of 631 grids with data points. Finally, a multiple linear regression model was employed to analyze the relationship between the ratios of objects obtained from street images via semantic segmentation and human sensory perception of the road environment. The findings from this analysis indicate that the attributes of distinct object classes have a notable impact on individuals’ perceptions of the road environment. Visual elements such as infrastructure, construction, nature, and vehicles were identified as influential factors in shaping the perception of the road environment. However, human and object features did not exhibit statistical significance in this regard. Furthermore, when examining different road environments, which can be categorized into urban, community, and rural contexts, it becomes evident that these contexts distinctly affect the perceptions of various road environments. Consequently, gaining a comprehensive understanding of how street environments are perceived is crucial for the design and planning of neighborhoods and urban communities, facilitating the creation of safer and more enjoyable living environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Pawinee Iamtrakul & Sararad Chayphong & Pittipol Kantavat & Kazuki Nakamura & Yoshitsugu Hayashi & Boonserm Kijsirikul & Yuji Iwahori, 2024. "Assessing Subjective and Objective Road Environment Perception in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region, Thailand: A Deep Learning Approach Utilizing Street Images," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1494-:d:1336712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1494/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1494/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luís Rita & Miguel Peliteiro & Tudor-Codrin Bostan & Tiago Tamagusko & Adelino Ferreira, 2023. "Using Deep Learning and Google Street View Imagery to Assess and Improve Cyclist Safety in London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Pawinee Iamtrakul & Sararad Chayphong & Pittipol Kantavat & Yoshitsugu Hayashi & Boonserm Kijsirikul & Yuji Iwahori, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Effects of Built Environment on Quality of Life Related Transportation by Integrating GIS and Deep Learning Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Yuting Qin & Yuren Chen & Kunhui Lin, 2020. "Quantifying the Effects of Visual Road Information on Drivers’ Speed Choices to Promote Self-Explaining Roads," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Xu, Shuhua & Sun, Chuanwang & Wei, Haoyu & Hou, Xinshuo, 2023. "Road construction and air pollution: Analysis of road area ratio in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pawinee Iamtrakul & Sararad Chayphong & Derlie Mateo-Babiano, 2023. "The Transition of Land Use and Road Safety Studies: A Systematic Literature Review (2000–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Milan Lalić & Milka Bubalo Živković & Bojan Đerčan & Dragana Tekić, 2024. "Quality of Life as a Limiting Factor in the Development of the Region along the Great Bačka Canal (Serbia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-33, March.
    3. Miray Gür, 2024. "Assessment of Student Quality of Life in Relation to University Campus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-49, October.
    4. Pawinee Iamtrakul & Sararad Chayphong & Alexander M. Crizzle, 2023. "Impact of Spatial Configuration on Promoting Lifelong Learning Development in Pathum Thani, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1494-:d:1336712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.