IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1408-d1335234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing the Valuation and Implementation Path of the Gross Ecosystem Product: A Case Study of Tonglu County, Hangzhou City

Author

Listed:
  • Yonghua Li

    (Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China
    The Architectural Design and Research Institute of Zhejiang University Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310028, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Huarong Wang

    (Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Chunju Liu

    (Hangzhou Planning and Natural Resources Survey and Monitoring Center, Hangzhou 310012, China)

  • Jianhua Sun

    (Hangzhou Planning and Natural Resources Survey and Monitoring Center, Hangzhou 310012, China)

  • Qinchuan Ran

    (Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China)

Abstract

Ecosystem products and services are fundamental to human survival and development. The gross ecosystem product can be defined as the total value of products and services provided by ecosystems for human wellbeing and sustainable socioeconomic development. This includes the value of production system products, ecosystem regulation services, and ecosystem cultural services. The valuation of gross ecosystem product offers crucial technical support for constructing mechanisms by which to realize them, and it holds significant importance in promoting the comprehensive green transformation of economic and social development. In this study, we introduce the definition and accounting methods of the gross ecosystem product and explore the application of the gross ecosystem product and ecosystem asset accounting in ecological benefit assessment, using Tonglu County in Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, as an example. Finally, we provide recommendations by which to strengthen gross ecosystem product accounting and explore mechanisms for realizing ecological values based on this foundation. The results indicate that in 2021, the total gross ecosystem product value of Tonglu County reached CNY 55.129 billion, equivalent to 1.33 times the gross domestic product of that year. Among the various services, regulatory services contributed the most to the total ecological products, with climate regulation being the largest contributor at CNY 27.199 billion, accounting for 49.34%. Tonglu County boasts abundant natural resources, which hold significant value. By conducting an audit of the total ecological products, we can precisely determine the value of the ecosystem. This aids relevant departments in estimating the value of ecological products in Tonglu County’s ecosystem. Such information can support the formulation of ecological protection and sustainable development policies in Tonglu County, while also serving as a reference for estimating the total ecological products and enhancing the ecological value in other counties.

Suggested Citation

  • Yonghua Li & Huarong Wang & Chunju Liu & Jianhua Sun & Qinchuan Ran, 2024. "Optimizing the Valuation and Implementation Path of the Gross Ecosystem Product: A Case Study of Tonglu County, Hangzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1408-:d:1335234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1408/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1408/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qingping Hu & Chunyan Lu & Tingting Chen & Wanting Chen & Huimei Yuan & Mengxing Zhou & Zijing Qiu & Lingxin Bao, 2023. "Evaluation and Analysis of the Gross Ecosystem Product towards the Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Fujian Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuefeng Min & Yang Yu & Rui Zhao & Xin Xiong & Sen Du & Qin Mou & Wenjie Xu, 2023. "System Dynamics-Based Game Theoretical Analysis for Watershed Eco-Compensation Design: A Case Study in Tuojiang River, Sichuan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Emilia Miszewska & Maciej Niedostatkiewicz & Radosław Wiśniewski, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Water Housing Using the Example of Poland: An Analysis of Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Lin Ji & Yuanjing Qi & Qun’ou Jiang & Chunhong Zhao, 2024. "Spatial–Temporal Variations of the Gross Ecosystem Product under the Influence of the Spatial Spillover Effect of Urbanization and Ecological Construction in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1408-:d:1335234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.