IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1281-d1332242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bedrock Type Mediates the Response of Vegetation Activity to Seasonal Precipitation in the Karst Forest

Author

Listed:
  • Xiguang Yang

    (School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Xuebing Guan

    (School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Zihan Jiang

    (CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China)

Abstract

Global warming is expected to enhance the severity and frequency of drought in subtropical areas; thus, understanding how vegetation growth responds to precipitation is crucial to comprehending the impact of these changes on ecosystem services, such as carbon storage. However, vegetation activity in subtropical karst regions in Southwest China is hard to explain when we merely consider the influence of climate and soil factors. In this study, we extended traditional research by combining bedrock data we aim to investigate the role of bedrock and its interaction with precipitation on plant growth in the Guizhou Province of China. We analyzed the differences in the precipitation–vegetation growth relationship in noncarbonate and carbonate rock regions, assessing the sensitivity of vegetation from two lithological types to drought. The results reveal that although there are no significant differences in climate and soil parameters between carbonate and noncarbonate regions, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in carbonate regions is more strongly related to precipitation (carbonate region: R 2 = 0.67; noncarbonate region: R 2 = 0.37), while the spring greenness–precipitation relationship show is more stable in the carbonate region. Our results show that the vegetation activity in the carbonate region is more vulnerable during the drought period, highlighting that the vegetation dynamic was not only regulated by climatic factors, and bedrock-caused water stress should be taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiguang Yang & Xuebing Guan & Zihan Jiang, 2024. "Bedrock Type Mediates the Response of Vegetation Activity to Seasonal Precipitation in the Karst Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1281-:d:1332242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1281/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1281/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott L. Morford & Benjamin Z. Houlton & Randy A. Dahlgren, 2011. "Increased forest ecosystem carbon and nitrogen storage from nitrogen rich bedrock," Nature, Nature, vol. 477(7362), pages 78-81, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian Chen & Xiaoxiao Zhang & Kai Wang & Zhenguo Yan & Wei Zhang & Lixin Niu & Yanlong Zhang, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage in Areas Rich in Ancient Remains: A Case Study of the Zhouyuan Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1281-:d:1332242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.