IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1089-d1327522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Independent Directors’ Interlocking Network Position Affect Green Innovation?

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Hu

    (Faculty of Business, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China)

  • Zhuohang Li

    (Faculty of Business, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China)

  • Jiajia Guo

    (School of Information Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

Green innovation is a potent driver of sustainability. Drawing on social network theory, this paper used data from Chinese listed companies from 2010 to 2020 as a sample and found that independent directors’ interlocking network position significantly enhanced corporate green innovation. Additionally, digital transformation positively moderated this impact, while environmental regulations exhibited a U-shaped influence on this relationship. Further analysis revealed that independent directors’ interlocking network position can enhance green innovation through leveraging information, resource advantages, and environmental responsibilities. The network position of companies with lower pollution levels and diligent independent directors notably amplified green innovation. This study clarifies the boundary conditions and mechanisms of corporate green innovation, offering new ideas and evidence for sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Hu & Zhuohang Li & Jiajia Guo, 2024. "Does Independent Directors’ Interlocking Network Position Affect Green Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1089-:d:1327522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1089/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1089/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coral B. Ingley, 2008. "Company growth and Board attitudes to corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 17-39.
    2. Adam B. Jaffe et al., 1995. "Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 132-163, March.
    3. Du, Juntao & Shen, Zhiyang & Song, Malin & Zhang, Linda, 2023. "Nexus between digital transformation and energy technology innovation: An empirical test of A-share listed enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Chenxi Guo & Ping Lv, 2018. "Network position of independent director in cross-border mergers and acquisitions," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 118-135, January.
    5. Rania Beji & Ouidad Yousfi & Nadia Loukil & Abdelwahed Omri, 2021. "Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from France," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 133-155, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Ming & Li, Yemei, 2024. "Do relationships matter?—Director networks and corporate open innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Hong Gao & Peng Gao, 2024. "Do Economic Growth Targets Hinder Green Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Heavy-Polluting Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Moro, 2021. "Can capital controls promote green investments in developing countries?," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1348, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    2. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Popova, Olga, 2024. "Environment vs. Economic Growth: Do Environmental Preferences Translate Into Support for Green Parties?," IZA Discussion Papers 17475, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Yang, Qiuyue & Song, Deyong, 2019. "How does environmental regulation break the resource curse: Theoretical and empirical study on China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Won-Kyu Lim & Cheong-Kyu Park, 2022. "Mandating Gender Diversity and the Value Relevance of Sustainable Development Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    5. Bommer, Rolf, 1995. "Environmental policy and industrial competitiveness: The pollution haven hypothesis reconsidered," Discussion Papers, Series II 262, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    6. Na Li Dawson & Kathleen Segerson, 2008. "Voluntary Agreements with Industries: Participation Incentives with Industry-Wide Targets," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(1), pages 97-114.
    7. McLaughlin, Patrick & Potts, Jason, 2019. "RegData: Australia," Working Papers 10062, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    8. Francesco Nicolli & Francesco Vona & Lionel Nesta, 2012. "Determinants of Renewable Energy Innovation: Environmental Policies vs. Market Regulation," Working Papers 201204, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    9. Al-Najjar, Basil & Salama, Aly, 2022. "Mind the gap: Are female directors and executives more sensitive to the environment in high-tech us firms?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Lei Ding & Xuejuan Fang, 2022. "Spatial–temporal distribution of air-pollution-intensive industries and its social-economic driving mechanism in Zhejiang Province, China: a framework of spatial econometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1681-1712, February.
    11. Stavins, Robert, 2001. "Lessons From the American Experiment With Market-Based Environmental Policies," RFF Working Paper Series dp-01-53, Resources for the Future.
    12. Kalpana Tokas & Kartik Yadav, 2023. "Foreign Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of an Emerging Market," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(6), pages 1302-1325, December.
    13. Arik Levinson & M. Scott Taylor, 2008. "Unmasking The Pollution Haven Effect," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 49(1), pages 223-254, February.
    14. Satyajit Majumdar & Gordhan K. Saini, 2016. "CSR in India: Critical Review and Exploring Entrepreneurial Opportunities," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 2(1), pages 56-79, January.
    15. David Saal & David Parker & Tom Weyman-Jones, 2007. "Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 127-139, October.
    16. Tiberio Daddi & Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Francesco Testa & Marco Frey & Fabio Iraldo, 2014. "The Effects of Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Regulation on Company Management and Competitiveness," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(8), pages 520-533, December.
    17. He, Zhenyu & Tang, Yuwei, 2023. "Local environmental constraints and firms’ export product quality: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    18. Chen, Chunhua & Jiang, Dequan & Lan, Meng & Li, Weiping & Ye, Ling, 2022. "Does environmental regulation affect labor investment Efficiency?Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 82-95.
    19. Ki‐Hoon Lee & Ji‐Whan Kim, 2011. "Integrating Suppliers into Green Product Innovation Development: an Empirical Case Study in the Semiconductor Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(8), pages 527-538, December.
    20. Alassane Drabo, 2011. "Agricultural primary commodity export and environmental degradation: what consequences for population's health?," CERDI Working papers halshs-00586034, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1089-:d:1327522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.