IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p874-d1322616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Manufacturer’s Strategies under Different Supply Interruption Risk Based on Supply Chain Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Guojun Ji

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Wen Hong

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

Abstract

In order to study the selection of coping strategies for the manufacturer facing different supply interruption risks, this paper constructs a supply chain consisting of one manufacturer and one supplier and uses no-taking coping strategies as the benchmark model to analyze the resilience of supply chain formed by the manufacturer’s adoption of penalty mechanism, emergency supplier mechanism, and strategic investment mechanism. The research shows that in the face of various levels of supply interruption risk, the manufacturer adopting a strategic investment mechanism will achieve high resilience, enabling the manufacturer and supplier to achieve mutual benefit and win-win results. In some cases of high interruption risk, the manufacturer adopting an emergency supplier mechanism can achieve higher chain resilience compared with not taking emergency measures, but its ability to improve supply chain resilience is weaker than that of a strategic investment mechanism. The penalty mechanism is applicable to situations where some interruption risk is characterized by low risk, and in such cases, both the penalty mechanism and the strategic investment mechanism can enhance the resilience of the supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Guojun Ji & Wen Hong, 2024. "Research on the Manufacturer’s Strategies under Different Supply Interruption Risk Based on Supply Chain Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:874-:d:1322616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/874/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/874/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pun, Hubert, 2014. "Supplier selection of a critical component when the production process can be improved," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 127-135.
    2. Li, Yongjian & Zhen, Xueping & Qi, Xiangtong & Cai, Gangshu (George), 2016. "Penalty and financial assistance in a supply chain with supply disruption," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 167-181.
    3. Sammi Yu Tang & Panos Kouvelis, 2011. "Supplier Diversification Strategies in the Presence of Yield Uncertainty and Buyer Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 439-451, October.
    4. Wang, Weijun & Han, Yicen & Wang, Meng & He, Yan, 2023. "Research on fair residential critical peak price: Based on a price penalty mechanism for high-electricity consumers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiang Li, 2017. "Optimal procurement strategies from suppliers with random yield and all-or-nothing risks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 167-181, October.
    2. Yanting Huang & Zongjun Wang, 2017. "Dual-Recycling Channel Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Cost Disruptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, November.
    3. Long He & Ying Rong & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2020. "Product Sourcing and Distribution Strategies under Supply Disruption and Recall Risks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 9-23, January.
    4. Hyoung Jun Kim & Su Jung Jee & So Young Sohn, 2021. "Cost–benefit model for multi-generational high-technology products to compare sequential innovation strategy with quality strategy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Woldt, Jason J. & Prasad, Sameer, 2022. "Crises in global supply chains: The role of impression management communications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    6. Zongbao Zou & Yuxin Liang & Lihao Chen, 2024. "Should Multinational Suppliers Relocate Their Production Capacity to Preferential Tariff Regions with Unreliable Supply under the Impact of Tariffs?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Shengqiang Hu & Lou Liu & Xing Liu, 2024. "Wholesale Price Contract or Mixed Wholesale-Option-Contract? Procurement Strategy for a Contract Farming Supply Chain under Flexible Supply," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Shaojian Qu & Hui Yang & Ying Ji, 2021. "Low-carbon supply chain optimization considering warranty period and carbon emission reduction level under cap-and-trade regulation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18040-18067, December.
    9. Xiaodan Jin & Hong Zhou, 2022. "Incentives to Enhance Production Reliability against Disruption: Cost-Sharing vs. Penalty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Maria C. Jansen & Osman Y. Özaltın, 2017. "Note on Cournot Competition Under Yield Uncertainty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 305-308, May.
    11. DeYong, Gregory D. & Pun, Hubert, 2015. "Is dishonesty the best policy? Supplier behaviour in a multi-tier supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 1-13.
    12. Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bosung, 2021. "Sourcing decision in the presence of a complementary component," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. Li, Wei & Zhao, Xuan, 2022. "Competition or coopetition? Equilibrium analysis in the presence of process improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 180-202.
    14. Yixuan Xiao, 2020. "Horizontal Mergers under Yield Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 24-34, January.
    15. Sarah Parlane & Ying-Yi Tsai, 2017. "Optimal Management of Supply Disruptions when Contracting with Unreliable, Risk-averse, Suppliers," Working Papers 201714, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    16. Süleyman Demirel & Roman Kapuscinski & Man Yu, 2018. "Strategic Behavior of Suppliers in the Face of Production Disruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 533-551, February.
    17. Panos Kouvelis & Guang Xiao & Nan Yang, 2021. "Role of Risk Aversion in Price Postponement Under Supply Random Yield," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4826-4844, August.
    18. Niu, Baozhuang & Li, Qiyang & Liu, Yaoqi, 2020. "Conflict management in a multinational firm's production shifting decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    19. Zhang, Yi & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Zhang, Juliang & Fernandez, Vicenc, 2020. "Risk pooling through physical probabilistic selling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 295-311.
    20. Tsan-Ming Choi & Kannan Govindan & Xiang Li & Yongjian Li, 2017. "Innovative supply chain optimization models with multiple uncertainty factors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:874-:d:1322616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.