IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p844-d1321909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enterprise Digital Transformation and Compliance in Cross-Regional Development: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Shaojun Yan

    (School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Yiyang Xi

    (Antai College of Economics & Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Zhaoxiang Wu

    (School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

The cross-regional development of enterprises has comparative advantages, but it also brings a new challenge to internal control. To address this challenge, this study suggests enterprise digital transformation as a solution and empirically tests the effect of enterprise digital transformation on the violation of nonlocal subsidiaries as a proxy of compliance in cross-regional development. Using the unique data from the internal control survey questionnaire of Chinese listed companies, this study measures the level of enterprise digital transformation. The empirical results reveal a significant negative correlation between the level of enterprise digital transformation and the degree of violation of nonlocal subsidiaries. The findings remain robust after a series of heterogeneity tests. The mechanism test reveals that enterprise digital transformation strengthens the governance over the violation of nonlocal subsidiaries by alleviating information asymmetry and improving internal control quality. The heterogeneity analysis addresses the issues regarding the factors influencing the effect of enterprise digital transformation including strategic focus, technical input-efficiency balance, and the role of organizational culture. And the results of heterogeneity analysis indicate that the governance effect of enterprise digital transformation is more pronounced at the business level rather than the functional level and at the transformation stage where technical investment and efficiency are balanced. Additional analysis indicates that the governance effect of enterprise digital transformation is more pronounced in nonlocal subsidiaries established through autonomous investment. Furthermore, economic benefit analysis reveals that enterprise digital transformation promotes cost reduction and the increase in efficiency in nonlocal subsidiaries. This study enriches the quantification and economic consequences of enterprise digital transformation, and it also offers valuable implications for promoting digital transformation in traditional enterprises and strengthening internal control and compliance in the context of cross-regional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaojun Yan & Yiyang Xi & Zhaoxiang Wu, 2024. "Enterprise Digital Transformation and Compliance in Cross-Regional Development: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-54, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:844-:d:1321909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/844/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/844/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoffman, Benjamin W. & Sellers, R. Drew & Skomra, Justyna, 2018. "The impact of client information technology capability on audit pricing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 59-75.
    2. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    3. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    4. Wilkin, Carla L. & Couchman, Paul K. & Sohal, Amrik & Zutshi, Ambika, 2016. "Exploring differences between smaller and large organizations' corporate governance of information technology," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 6-25.
    5. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    6. Jiang, Guohua & Lee, Charles M.C. & Yue, Heng, 2010. "Tunneling through intercorporate loans: The China experience," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Yolande E. Chan & Sid L. Huff & Donald W. Barclay & Duncan G. Copeland, 1997. "Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 125-150, June.
    8. Irena Hutton & Danling Jiang & Alok Kumar, 2015. "Political Values, Culture, and Corporate Litigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(12), pages 2905-2925, December.
    9. Oliver E. Williamson, 2000. "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 595-613, September.
    10. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    11. Erik Brynjolfsson & Kristina McElheran, 2016. "The Rapid Adoption of Data-Driven Decision-Making," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 133-139, May.
    12. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-07-2015-2139 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Kee‐Hong Bae & Jun‐Koo Kang & Jin‐Mo Kim, 2002. "Tunneling or Value Added? Evidence from Mergers by Korean Business Groups," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(6), pages 2695-2740, December.
    14. Chenggang Wang & Tiansen Liu & Yue Zhu & Meng Lin & Wenhao Chang & Xinyu Wang & Dongrong Li & He Wang & Jinsol Yoo, 2022. "Digital Economy, Environmental Regulation and Corporate Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, October.
    15. David G Sirmon & Peter J Lane, 2004. "A model of cultural differences and international alliance performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 35(4), pages 306-319, July.
    16. Chang, Yu-Tzu & Chen, Hanchung & Cheng, Rainbow K. & Chi, Wuchun, 2019. "The impact of internal audit attributes on the effectiveness of internal control over operations and compliance," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19.
    17. Salim Chahine & Gonul Colak & Iftekhar Hasan & Mohamad Mazboudi, 2020. "Investor relations and IPO performance," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 474-512, June.
    18. Khaldoon Al-Htaybat & Larissa von Alberti-Alhtaybat, 2017. "Big Data and corporate reporting: impacts and paradoxes," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 850-873, May.
    19. Ashbaugh-Skaife, Hollis & Collins, Daniel W. & Kinney Jr., William R., 2007. "The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 166-192, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xingqiang Du, 2014. "Does Religion Mitigate Tunneling? Evidence from Chinese Buddhism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 299-327, December.
    2. Nguyen, Thi Tuyet Mai, 2017. "An examination of independent directors in Vietnam," OSF Preprints ay6dv, Center for Open Science.
    3. Aaron J. Mandell, 2022. "The value of tunneling: Evidence from master limited partnership formations," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1-2), pages 355-380, January.
    4. Xingqiang Du, 2015. "Does Confucianism Reduce Minority Shareholder Expropriation? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(4), pages 661-716, December.
    5. Joseph P. H. Fan & Li Jin & Guojian Zheng, 2016. "Revisiting the Bright and Dark Sides of Capital Flows in Business Groups," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(4), pages 509-528, April.
    6. Fuxiu Jiang & Kenneth A Kim, 2020. "Corporate Governance in China: A Survey [The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: a conceptual framework and survey]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 24(4), pages 733-772.
    7. Hsu, Audrey Wen-hsin & Liu, Sophia Hsin-Tsai, 2016. "Organizational structure, agency costs, and accrual quality," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 35-60.
    8. Cheng, Minying & Liu, Jun & Zhang, Longwen, 2020. "Tunneling through allies: Affiliated shareholders, insider trading, and monitoring failure," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 323-345.
    9. Wei Huang & Hong Zhang & Abhinav Goyal & Jason Laws, 2019. "Internal capital market mergers in weak external market environment: An emerging market evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 1486-1505, October.
    10. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    11. Isabelle Le Breton–Miller & Danny Miller, 2006. "Why Do Some Family Businesses Out–Compete? Governance, Long–Term Orientations, and Sustainable Capability," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(6), pages 731-746, November.
    12. Cheng, Louis T.W. & Leung, T.Y., 2016. "Government protection, political connection and management turnover in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 160-176.
    13. Mouna Mrad & Slaheddine Hallara, 2014. "The Relationship Between the Board of Directors and the Performance/Value Creation in a Context of Privatization: The Case of French Companies," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 83-108, March.
    14. Bansal, Shashank & Thenmozhi, M., 2020. "Does Concentrated Founder Ownership Affect Related Party Transactions? Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    15. Byung-Seong Min & Peter Verhoeven, 2013. "Outsider Board Activity, Ownership Structure and Firm Value: Evidence from Korea," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 13(2), pages 187-214, June.
    16. Randall Morck, 2011. "Finance and Governance in Developing Economies," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 375-406, December.
    17. Yasemin Kor & Joseph Mahoney & Sharon Watson, 2008. "The effects of demand, competitive, and technological uncertainty on board monitoring and institutional ownership of IPO firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(3), pages 239-259, August.
    18. Aggarwal, Raj & Jindal, Varun & Seth, Rama, 2019. "Board diversity and firm performance: The role of business group affiliation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    19. Pascucci, Stefano & Royer, Annie & Bijman, Jos, 2012. "To Make or to Buy: Is this the Question?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Wilkin, Carla L. & Couchman, Paul K. & Sohal, Amrik & Zutshi, Ambika, 2016. "Exploring differences between smaller and large organizations' corporate governance of information technology," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 6-25.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:844-:d:1321909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.