IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11272-d1550392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and Environmental Impact Analysis of Innovative Peeling Methods in the Tomato Processing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Elham Eslami

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy)

  • Giovanni Landi

    (ENEA, Portici Research Center, Piazzale Enrico Fermi, Località Granatello, 80055 Portici, NA, Italy)

  • Miriam Benedetti

    (ENEA, Casaccia Research Center, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, RM, Italy)

  • Gianpiero Pataro

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy)

Abstract

Peeling is a key step in the industrial production of canned peeled tomatoes, vital for optimizing efficiency, yield, product quality, waste reduction, and environmental impact. This study presents a comparative assessment of the economic and environmental impacts of adopting innovative peeling technologies, including infrared (IR), ohmic heating-assisted lye (OH-lye), and ultrasound-assisted lye (US-lye) peeling, relative to conventional steam and lye peeling methods. Focusing on a medium-sized Italian tomato processor, the impacts of these methods on productivity, water and energy consumption, wastewater generation, and environmental footprint using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology, were evaluated. Findings indicated that adopting IR, OH-lye, and US-lye methods enhanced peelability (ease of peeling > 4.5) and increased production capacity by 2.6–9.2%, while reducing solid waste by 16–52% compared to conventional steam and lye methods. LCA results showed IR as the most environmentally favorable method, followed by steam, OH-lye, and US-lye, with conventional lye peeling being the least sustainable. OH-lye and IR methods also significantly reduce water and energy use, while US-lye shows higher demands in these areas. Additionally, OH-lye and IR methods require little or no NaOH, minimizing chemical consumption and wastewater production, which offers notable environmental and cost advantages. Overall, this preliminary study underscores economic and environmental potential for novel peeling technologies, encouraging industry consideration for adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Elham Eslami & Giovanni Landi & Miriam Benedetti & Gianpiero Pataro, 2024. "Economic and Environmental Impact Analysis of Innovative Peeling Methods in the Tomato Processing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11272-:d:1550392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11272/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11272/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11272-:d:1550392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.