IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10903-d1542427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Girder Bridge Apparent Condition Rating Model Based on Machine Learning and Inspection Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Yongcheng Ji

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Yangyang Qin

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Wenyuan Xu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

The importance of bridge technical condition assessment is not only to ensure traffic safety but also to ensure the project’s sustainable development. Therefore, problems exist in the traditional highway bridge technical condition evaluation standard, such as fixed weight value, cumbersome calculation, and intense subjectivity. A total of 146 bridge inspection reports in Heilongjiang Province were collected in this paper. Using Pearson correlation analysis for bridge components and bridge age and length, the features with strong correlation are identified as the basis for modeling, and a machine learning model is introduced to evaluate the technical condition of the bridge. The application effects of the BP neural network, support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and particle swarm optimization-support vector machine (PSO-SVM) in bridge evaluation and classification are compared and analyzed. The results show that the essential parameters penalty factor c and kernel function g in support vector machine optimized by particle swarm optimization overcome the shortcomings of the SVM model, improving the accuracy of the assessment. It can be used as an effective means to evaluate the technical condition of bridges and provide scientific decision-making reference for the maintenance of bridges.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongcheng Ji & Yangyang Qin & Wenyuan Xu, 2024. "Girder Bridge Apparent Condition Rating Model Based on Machine Learning and Inspection Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10903-:d:1542427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10903/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10903/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10903-:d:1542427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.