Author
Listed:
- Aneta Vitkova
(Department of Construction Management and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thakurova 7, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic)
- Stanislav Vitasek
(Department of Construction Management and Economics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thakurova 7, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic)
Abstract
The article mostly addresses the application of sustainable technologies in residential construction through life cycle cost analysis (LCC) using the net present value (NPV) calculation method. The authors rely on data obtained through their own research and information received from the market environment. The article outputs are in the form of conclusions based on a case study on a specific building (apartment building), elaborated in several versions with respect to the technologies used. In total, there are seven alternative versions divided into two groups, where a so-called reference technology representing a traditional (standard) technical solution is present in each group so that a relevant comparison can be made. The first group includes technologies related to heating and hot water, while the second group focuses on the application of recycled water (so-called grey water). The outputs obtained provide an interesting and fact-based view of sustainable technologies within the life cycle of a building drawing from currently available information sources. At the same time, the presented analysis has incorporated price predictions for key commodities, i.e., electricity, water, gas. The article’s specific conclusions indicate that the technologies utilizing renewable energy sources (RES) are typically less economically advantageous (in the absence of subsidy sources) compared to conventional (traditional) solutions, despite the significant savings in operating costs. The LCC indicator revealed a cost value per square meter of gross floor area (GFA) for a residential building ranging from EUR 43 to 68, contingent on the specific option under consideration. This cost value was determined over a 20-year follow-up period and a real discount rate of 4%.
Suggested Citation
Aneta Vitkova & Stanislav Vitasek, 2024.
"A Case Study on Sustainable Technologies in Residential Buildings from a Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCC) Perspective,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10892-:d:1542329
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10892-:d:1542329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.