Author
Listed:
- Nermeen Gamal Rezk
(Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh 33516, Egypt)
- Samah Alshathri
(Department of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)
- Amged Sayed
(Department of Electrical Energy Engineering, College of Engineering & Technology, Arab Academy for Science Technology & Maritime Transport, Smart Village Campus, Giza 12577, Egypt
Industrial Electronics and Control Engineering Department, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menoufia 32952, Egypt)
- Ezz El-Din Hemdan
(Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menoufia 32952, Egypt
Structure and Materials Research Lab, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 12435, Saudi Arabia)
- Heba El-Behery
(Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh 33516, Egypt)
Abstract
Air pollution has exceeded the anticipated safety limit and addressing this issue is crucial for sustainability, particularly in countries with high pollution levels. So, monitoring and forecasting air quality is essential for sustainable urban development. Therefore, this paper presents multiclass classification using two feature selection techniques, namely Sequential Forward Selection (SFS) and filtering, both with different machine learning and ensemble techniques, to predict air quality and make sure that the most relevant features are included in datasets for air quality determination. The results of the considered framework reveal that the SFS technique provides superior performance compared to filter feature selection (FFS) with different ML methods, including the AdaBoost Classifier, the Extra Tree Classifier, Random Forest (RF), and the Bagging Classifier, for efficiently determining the Air Quality Index (AQI). These models’ performances are assessed using predetermined performance metrics. The AdaBoost Classifier model with FFS has the lowest accuracy, while the RF model with SFS achieves the highest accuracy, at 78.4% and 99.99%, respectively. Based on the raw dataset, it was noted that the F1-score, recall, and precision values of the RF model with SFS are 99.96%, 99.97%, and 99.98%, respectively. Therefore, the experimental results undoubtedly show the supremacy, reliability, and robustness of the proposed approach in determining the AQI effectively.
Suggested Citation
Nermeen Gamal Rezk & Samah Alshathri & Amged Sayed & Ezz El-Din Hemdan & Heba El-Behery, 2024.
"Sustainable Air Quality Detection Using Sequential Forward Selection-Based ML Algorithms,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10835-:d:1541345
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10835-:d:1541345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.