IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10767-d1539385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Influencing Factors of Urban Community Residents’ Willingness to Segregate Waste Based on Structural Equation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjian Luo

    (Center for Anti-Corruption Studies, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China
    Department of Public Administration, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)

  • Ziqin Yu

    (Department of Public Administration, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)

  • Panling Zhou

    (Institute of Soil and Fertilizer & Resources and Environment, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang 330200, China)

  • Yuanyuan Ren

    (Department of Public Administration, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)

  • Hua Lv

    (Department of Public Administration, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China)

Abstract

Segregation of household waste is an important means of achieving resource recovery, minimization and harmlessness of waste, which is of great significance in addressing the dilemma of the “rubbish siege”. However, at present, urban community residents still face many challenges in the practice of household waste classification, such as lack of classification knowledge, imperfect classification facilities and weak and persistent classification behavior, which seriously restrict the effective promotion of garbage classification work. In this paper, a model of the factors influencing community residents’ willingness to separate household waste was developed based on the theory of planned behavior and tested by using structural equation modeling (SEM) with a sample of 218 surveys conducted among residents of community X in Nanchang, Jiangxi Province. It was found that urban community residents were generally willing to sort their household waste subjectively. The five factors of waste sorting recognition, intrinsic moral constraints, group behavioral incentives, time and space factors and waste sorting facilities positively influenced urban community residents’ willingness to sort household waste. Government job satisfaction and legal and regulatory constraints had no significant influence on urban community residents’ willingness to sort household waste and did not reach a statistically significant level. Based on this, in the future, we should strengthen public education, enhance group behavioral incentives, improve supporting infrastructure, standardize and improve laws and regulations to improve residents’ willingness to separate household waste and promote the process of urban household waste segregation in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjian Luo & Ziqin Yu & Panling Zhou & Yuanyuan Ren & Hua Lv, 2024. "Research on the Influencing Factors of Urban Community Residents’ Willingness to Segregate Waste Based on Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10767-:d:1539385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10767/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10767/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Faganel Armand & Streicher Anton, 2022. "Social Marketing as a Tool for a Sustainable Municipal Waste Management," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 87-97, June.
    2. Qiao Liu & Qianhui Xu & Xin Shen & Bowei Chen & Sonia Sadeghian Esfahani, 2022. "The Mechanism of Household Waste Sorting Behaviour—A Study of Jiaxing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Peter Onyonje Osiako & Viktória Szente, 2024. "Behavioral Intention in Domestic Heritage Tourism—An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Shen & Xun Cao & Sonia Sadeghian Esfahani & Tayyaba Saleem, 2022. "Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchase Intention on Cold Chain Aquatic Products under COVID-19: An Investigation in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Baihui Jin & Wei Li, 2023. "External Factors Impacting Residents’ Participation in Waste Sorting Using NCA and fsQCA Methods on Pilot Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Zhaoyun Yin & Jing Ma, 2022. "Rational Choice or Altruism Factor: Determinants of Residents’ Behavior toward Household Waste Separation in Xi’an, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Yongqi Liang & Jian Tang & Heng Xia & Loai Aljerf & Bingyin Gao & Mulugeta Legesse Akele, 2023. "Three-Dimensional Numerical Modeling and Analysis for the Municipal Solid-Waste Incineration of the Grate Furnace for Particulate-Matter Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Jian Cao & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison & Wei Wei, 2022. "The Role of Social Capital in Predicting Tourists’ Waste Sorting Intentions in Rural Destinations: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Yalin Yuan & Minyue Xu & Hanxin Chen, 2022. "What Factors Affect Farmers’ Levels of Domestic Waste Sorting Behavior? A Case Study from Shaanxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Xuxi Wang & Jing Tan, 2022. "The Perception and Attitude of Farmers toward Domestic Waste Classifications: A Case Study on Wusheng County, Sichuan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Wei Li & Si Chen & Zhihao Wang & Guomin Li & Xiaoguang Liu, 2022. "The Influence of Message Framing on Residents’ Waste Separation Willingness—The Mediating Role of Moral Identity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Nor Isnaeni Dwi Arista & Dwini Handayani & Ninin Ernawati, 2023. "Is It Possible to Implement the Same Circular-Economy Concept in Rural and Urban Areas? Study on Willingness to Pay for Household Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Ferdinan & Suyud Warno Utomo & Tri Edhi Budhi Soesilo & Herdis Herdiansyah, 2022. "Household Waste Control Index towards Sustainable Waste Management: A Study in Bekasi City, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Jing, Huiyan & Cui, Yue & Ye, Meiying & Yan, Xusheng & Liu, Yanping, 2022. "Effect of zero-valent iron on acidification and methane production using food waste under different food-to-microorganism ratios," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 131-143.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10767-:d:1539385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.