IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10636-d1536655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy Assessment of Advanced Laser Scanner Technologies for Forest Survey Based on Three-Dimensional Point Cloud Data

Author

Listed:
  • Jin-Soo Kim

    (Department of Construction Information, Andong Science College, Andong 36729, Republic of Korea)

  • Sang-Min Sung

    (CCZ Forest Land Management Office, Korea Forest Conservation Association, Daejeon 35262, Republic of Korea)

  • Ki-Suk Back

    (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 44610, Republic of Korea)

  • Yong-Su Lee

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Changwon National University, Changwon 51140, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Forests play a crucial role in carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation, offering ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, and water resource management. As global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensify, the demand for accurate spatial information to monitor forest conditions and assess carbon absorption capacity has grown. LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) has emerged as a transformative tool, providing high-resolution 3D spatial data for detailed analysis of forest attributes, including tree height, canopy structure, and biomass distribution. Unlike traditional manpower-intensive forest surveys, which are time-consuming and often limited in accuracy, LiDAR offers a more efficient and reliable solution. This study evaluates the accuracy and applicability of advanced LiDAR technologies—drone-mounted, terrestrial, and mobile scanners—for generating 3D forest spatial data. The results show that the terrestrial LiDAR achieved the highest precision for diameter at breast height (DBH) and tree height measurements, with RMSE values of 0.66 cm and 0.91 m, respectively. Drone-mounted LiDAR demonstrated excellent efficiency for large-scale surveys, while mobile LiDAR offered portability and speed but required further improvement in accuracy (e.g., RMSE: DBH 0.76 cm, tree height 1.83 m). By comparing these technologies, this study identifies their strengths, limitations, and optimal application scenarios, contributing to more accurate forest management practices and carbon absorption assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin-Soo Kim & Sang-Min Sung & Ki-Suk Back & Yong-Su Lee, 2024. "Accuracy Assessment of Advanced Laser Scanner Technologies for Forest Survey Based on Three-Dimensional Point Cloud Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10636-:d:1536655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10636/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10636/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jie Song & Xuelu Liu & Samuel Adingo & Yanlong Guo & Quanxi Li, 2024. "A Comparative Analysis of Remote Sensing Estimation of Aboveground Biomass in Boreal Forests Using Machine Learning Modeling and Environmental Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Xuan Liu & Ruirui Wang & Wei Shi & Xiaoyan Wang & Yaoyao Yang, 2024. "Research on Estimation Model of Carbon Stock Based on Airborne LiDAR and Feature Screening," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Mohamed Mouafik & Abdelghani Chakhchar & Mounir Fouad & Ahmed El Aboudi, 2024. "Remote Sensing Technologies for Monitoring Argane Forest Stands: A Comprehensive Review," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10636-:d:1536655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.