Author
Listed:
- Xiaowang Zhang
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Shuangqing Li
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Xiaoqian Liu
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Shengqi Jian
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Shuren Li
(Safety Supervision Division, Henan Provincial Department of Transportation, Zhengzhou 450000, China)
- Jinchao Yue
(School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
Abstract
Given the increasing complexity of transportation systems and the critical need for effective safety oversight, this study aims to evaluate and improve the transportation safety supervision (TSS) system in Henan Province, China. Based on questionnaire data from relevant units in Henan Province, China, a three-level index system of the effectiveness of TSS consisting of 4 criterion-level indicators and 25 factory-level indicators is established. By combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and grey system theory, a hierarchical grey evaluation model is constructed to evaluate the current situation of TSS in Henan Province. The results show that the evaluation index system and the weights of each index are reliable. The comprehensive evaluation value of the TSS system in Henan Province is 3.08, indicating that the effectiveness of the system is at level 2; thus, the current situation of TSS in Henan Province is good. Based on the calculated evaluation values of the first- and second-level indicators, suggestions are put forward to strengthen the management of the TSS by supervision units at all levels.
Suggested Citation
Xiaowang Zhang & Shuangqing Li & Xiaoqian Liu & Shengqi Jian & Shuren Li & Jinchao Yue, 2024.
"Research on the Establishment and Application of a Transportation Safety Supervision Evaluation System Based on Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-22, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10600-:d:1535949
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10600-:d:1535949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.