IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10573-d1535261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Sustainability of Longtime Operating Infrastructure for Romanian Flood Risk Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana Popescu

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands
    Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania
    Department of Hydroinformatics and Socio-Technical Innovation, IHE Delft, 2611 AX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Camelia Teau

    (Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania
    Mures Water Administration, Romanian Waters, 540057 Târgu Mureș, Romania)

  • Cristian Moisescu-Ciocan

    (Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania
    Banat Water Administration, Romanian Waters, 300222 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Constantin Florescu

    (Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Relu Adam

    (Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania
    Siret Water Administration, Romanian Waters, 600274 Bacău, Romania)

  • Albert Titus Constantin

    (Department of Hydrotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Politechnica University Timisoara, 300500 Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

Flood protection infrastructures are crucial for enhancing the resilience of societies exposed to natural hazards. Newly designed infrastructures are evaluated for sustainability using a coherent and internationally recognized method defined by the International Hydropower Association (IHA). However, in operation, old structures require a different assessment approach. Different work proposes a modified IHA protocol, mHSAP, which identifies opportunities for improvement and develops a sustainability evaluation framework for existing infrastructures. This paper applies the modified protocol to evaluate the sustainability of two types of flood protection structures: a unique canal system for flood–drought protection of an urban area and a flood protection dike. The time of operation of these structures is over 250 years and over 50 years, respectively. The application of the modified framework demonstrates its advantages in identifying areas for improving flood protection structure operation while maintaining the structure’s sustainability. It also illustrates how Romanian water boards can use such tools to facilitate collaboration between structure owners and stakeholders, allowing them to assess the risks and effects of flooding on society. Through these two examples from Romania, we also show that the mHSAP framework has the potential to actively support the fulfillment of the United Nations Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The results presented here show that this method can be further utilized by water board authorities to account for climate change effects, address related challenges in a coordinated and efficient manner, develop resilient flood management strategies, inform infrastructure investment decisions, and enhance collaboration among water management authorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana Popescu & Camelia Teau & Cristian Moisescu-Ciocan & Constantin Florescu & Relu Adam & Albert Titus Constantin, 2024. "Evaluating the Sustainability of Longtime Operating Infrastructure for Romanian Flood Risk Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10573-:d:1535261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10573/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10573/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elżbieta Macioszek & Anna Granà & Paulo Fernandes & Margarida C. Coelho, 2022. "New Perspectives and Challenges in Traffic and Transportation Engineering Supporting Energy Saving in Smart Cities—A Multidisciplinary Approach to a Global Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-8, June.
    2. Fatica, Serena & Katay, Gabor & Rancan, Michela, 2022. "Floods and firms: vulnerabilities and resilience to natural disasters in Europe," JRC Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2022-13, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
    3. Berry Gersonius & Richard Ashley & Assela Pathirana & Chris Zevenbergen, 2013. "Climate change uncertainty: building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 411-423, January.
    4. Zhenci Xu & Sophia N. Chau & Xiuzhi Chen & Jian Zhang & Yingjie Li & Thomas Dietz & Jinyan Wang & Julie A. Winkler & Fan Fan & Baorong Huang & Shuxin Li & Shaohua Wu & Anna Herzberger & Ying Tang & De, 2020. "Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time," Nature, Nature, vol. 577(7788), pages 74-78, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Liuyue & Xu, Zhenci & Wang, Sufen & Bao, Jianxia & Fan, Yunfei & Daccache, Andre, 2022. "Optimal crop planting pattern can be harmful to reach carbon neutrality: Evidence from food-energy-water-carbon nexus perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    2. Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie & Maruf Yakubu Ahmed & Phebe Asantewaa Owusu, 2022. "Global adaptation readiness and income mitigate sectoral climate change vulnerabilities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Manal Ammari & Mohammed Chentouf & Mohammed Ammari & Laïla Ben Allal, 2022. "Assessing National Progress in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: A Case Study of Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    4. Haixing Liu & Yuntao Wang & Chi Zhang & Albert S. Chen & Guangtao Fu, 2018. "Assessing real options in urban surface water flood risk management under climate change," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(1), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Kim, Amy M. & Li, Huanan, 2020. "Incorporating the impacts of climate change in transportation infrastructure decision models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 271-287.
    6. Chi Zhang & Zhongchang Sun & Qiang Xing & Jialong Sun & Tianyu Xia & Hao Yu, 2021. "Localizing Indicators of SDG11 for an Integrated Assessment of Urban Sustainability—A Case Study of Hainan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Xiaojun Zhang & Weiqiao Wang & Yunan Bai & Yong Ye, 2022. "How Has China Structured Its Ecological Governance Policy System?—A Case from Fujian Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    8. repec:cte:wsrepe:37973 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Agostino, Mariarosaria, 2024. "Extreme weather events and firms’ energy practices. The role of country governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    10. Kyeongseok Kim & Ji-Sung Kim, 2018. "Economic Assessment of Flood Control Facilities under Climate Uncertainty: A Case of Nakdong River, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Han, Bo & Jin, Xiaobin & Sun, Rui & Li, Hanbing & Liang, Xinyuan & Zhou, Yinkang, 2023. "Understanding land-use sustainability with a systematical framework: An evaluation case of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    12. Jingan Chen & Chengdong Yi & Yourong Wang & Tianyu Bi, 2022. "Do Honored Cities Achieve a Sustainable Development? A Quasi-Natural Experimental Study Based on “National Civilized City” Campaign in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Mark Zandvoort & Nora Kooijmans & Paul Kirshen & Adri van den Brink, 2019. "Designing with Pathways: A Spatial Design Approach for Adaptive and Sustainable Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Thomas D. Pol & Ekko C. Ierland & Silke Gabbert, 2017. "Economic analysis of adaptive strategies for flood risk management under climate change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 267-285, February.
    15. Pires, Aliny P.F. & Rodriguez Soto, Clarita & Scarano, Fabio R., 2021. "Strategies to reach global sustainability should take better account of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    16. Mehmet Çağlar & Cem Gürler, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals: A cluster analysis of worldwide countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8593-8624, June.
    17. Zhixing Li & Xin He & Zhuojun Ding & Md. Mehrab Hossain & Md. Tanvir Rahman Rifat & Md. Habibur Rahman Sobuz & Yafei Zhao, 2024. "Analysis of influencing factors for housing construction technology in Desakota Village and town communities in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Wu, Dong & Geng, Yong & Pan, Hengyu, 2021. "Whether natural gas consumption bring double dividends of economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions reduction in China?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    19. Li, Jiajia & Yang, Shiyu & Li, Jun & Li, Houjian, 2024. "Targeting SDG7: Identifying heterogeneous energy dilemmas for socially disadvantaged groups in India using machine learning," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    20. Lauren Rickards & John Wiseman & Taegen Edwards & Che Biggs, 2014. "The Problem of Fit: Scenario Planning and Climate Change Adaptation in the Public Sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(4), pages 641-662, August.
    21. Rui Shi & Benjamin F. Hobbs & Huai Jiang, 2019. "When can decision analysis improve climate adaptation planning? Two procedures to match analysis approaches with adaptation problems," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 611-630, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10573-:d:1535261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.